How do small woofers produce large bass?


Hi All,

I am looking at loudspeakers... I currently own the Arendal 1723 THX Monitors. 2 8" woofers each. I listen to probably 80% home theater and 20% pure two-channel music of all sorts. I am contemplating upgrading the speakers, and there are a number that I am very interested in. The Arendals are killer for music and home theater. In fact crazy amazing at home theater. I have also 2 SVS SB-3000 subs. 

But as we all know, wanting to upgrade. blah blah ad nauseum.  :) 
 And most everything I’m looking at has 6.5" bass drivers, usually 2 per speaker. I am looking at the Acoustic Energy Corinium, the KEF R11 Meta, the Dali Opticon 8 MKII, and the PSB T600.

I have a fear that the bass will be plenty for two-channel music, but won’t have that bad-ass slam of the Arendal’s dual 8" drivers. So my question is sort of a scientific one or a physics one. I am baffled as to how the 6.5" drivers in all of these new speakers are going to produce home theater sized bass. I’ve watched every video, read every article about those 4 contenders (above) - and everything/everybody says essentially "no worries, the woofers are lighter and faster, and since there are two of them, they make a great deal of bass. I just think I’m not seeing the "science" or "physics" of that. Like how are these 6.5" drivers going to handle something incredibly powerful/dynamic (bomb blasts/gun shots/thunder/explosions etc etc???  I’m afraid I’ll be let down by something like the PSB T600’s or the KEF R11 Metas when head to head with the dual 8" drivers in my Arendals. I’m hoping people can assure me and/or run through the science....  thanks to all.    Oh, and yes, I do cross over to my two subs at 60Hz.   

audiotruth

@pcrhkr wrote:

As far as woofer size, the effective radiated area of 2 six inch woofers will be about the same as a 12" woofer.

No, dual 6" woofers only cover half the displacement of a 12" woofer. There’s a significant difference. 

My experience is that a larger woofer will give more slam, hit, kick, in a 12" woofer vs two 6". However, the two 6" will likely respond more quickly in music dynamics because there is less mass to control.

In this case a 12" woofer would first and foremost move more air, i.e.: twice of that produced by dual 6" woofers. The perceived difference between these two scenarios would depend on several factors, but certainly the 12" woofer must be expected to have more impact, albeit not necessarily how one would imagine it.

What I’ve found is that I prefer a single larger woofer vs. several smaller ones, however a comparison would have to factor in that a woofer of, say, 15" is typically a higher efficiency variant (you don’t see many 15" low eff. "Hi-Fi" woofers), and thus it’s likely used differently than an array of low fs woofers with all that implies sonically. 

As a general observation though I tend to find larger woofers (vs. several smaller) to be more tuneful, articulate and less conspicuous in the mix. Many may believe a 15" woofer to be this crazy beast that puts out loads of bass compared to a pair of 6.5 or 8" woofers, but the perceived outcome is actually quite different, I find. 

I run my pro pioneers (dual 12s) with a dual 18 horn loaded pro sub...or i swap it with a 21 inch  sub. There is something about these large subs covering the low octaves, i probably won't be going under 18 inch subs hereafter. The crap coming out of things at axpona and the like..these boys have some things to learn.

The Tekton guy perhaps managed to word some of this...

https://youtu.be/4PIE1znQv2U?si=uNAviV8EcHfLp502

@phusis wrote

 

What I’ve found is that I prefer a single larger woofer vs. several smaller ones, however a comparison would have to factor in that a woofer of, say, 15" is typically a higher efficiency variant (you don’t see many 15" low eff. "Hi-Fi" woofers), and thus it’s likely used differently than an array of low fs woofers with all that implies sonically. 

As a general observation though I tend to find larger woofers (vs. several smaller) to be more tuneful, articulate and less conspicuous in the mix. Many may believe a 15" woofer to be this crazy beast that puts out loads of bass compared to a pair of 6.5 or 8" woofers, but the perceived outcome is actually quite different, I find. 

I agree with most of the post above.. The physical size of the driver matters to make more bass, in terms of deeper sounding

@deep_333 

better idea to lose bass extension below 80hz, get the sensitivity up to 100db

That's home theater speaker design like JTR. There is also a market preference for HI-FI speakers. Also if you speak into your phone and look at a spectrum analyzer app, you'll see your voice at 50Hz or below, which you can localize. 80Hz crossover is not good in a HT setup using a single sub in LFE because if the sub in back, dialog will come from there instead of the center speaker. That's the compromise with HT speakers if you want SPL. There's less of a compromise with capable full range speakers. They're capable of +105dB peak. Most people don't listen at an average above 80dB. Simply calibrating is painfully loud.

 

if you can actually put your main speakers now in the right spot for a low bass/distributed bass Geddes array...problem is those spots will be lousy spots for everything else a speaker has to do, imaging, soundstage and so on

That theory was also disproved with the measurement I posted. Also the speakers are toed 2' wide of MLP (middle of two outer seats), not at MLP as many theory suggest. 1' wide is the best imaging and soundstage for MLP, but not for the other seats. Another thing; the flat response is mainly a point of reference. Many prefer a v-curve for music.

@deep_333 wrote:

 

I run my pro pioneers (dual 12s) with a dual 18 horn loaded pro sub...or i swap it with a 21 inch  sub. There is something about these large subs covering the low octaves, i probably won't be going under 18 inch subs hereafter.

Is the 21" variant also horn-loaded? I also crave those larger woofers of higher efficiency, but the important aspect to me is the specific design in which they're implemented; for sub duties I prefer those larger drivers to be at least partially "hidden" and not direct radiating, as the latter seems to more readily expose the sense of a large woofer cone, not as much for giving the feeling of an effort being made as for having a "cone sound."

When used in horn-loaded or high order bandpass designs however where the woofer is more or less hidden the end result is a typically cleaner, less character-laden and more "the bass is simply there"-feeling with the variable being overall wallop/SPL and extension depending on the driver diameter, design direction and size. 

The crap coming out of things at axpona and the like..these boys have some things to learn.

Absolutely. They're usually bound by small size and still wanting to have their cake and eat it too (i.e.: extension from small size, with all that implies).  

The Tekton guy perhaps managed to word some of this...

https://youtu.be/4PIE1znQv2U?si=uNAviV8EcHfLp502

Indeed he does. Thanks for supplying the link.