What innovative, unconventional cartridge designs can you recommend?


Most cartridges have a stylus and cantilever where the transducer (magnet, iron or coil) sits on the far end of the cantilever.  What other designs are there?

I am mindful of two designs which put the business end right on top of the stylus.  The first is the moving coil (MC) Audio Technica AT-ART1000 which places two tiny coils, each 0.9-mm diameter, with eight turns of wire directly above the stylus.  Australian price is about AUD-7000 and there apparently is a newer model, slightly less exxe. the ART1000X.  This has square coils for a bit more output, and threaded mounting holes.

A downside is that stylus replacement involves a factory maintenance program and the Australian website page describing this service does not exist.

Another design is optical, exemplified by DS Audio's range.  While these still need a stylus to trace the groove, the signal is produced by reading the intensity of light produced by a Light Emitting Diode (LED) hitting two sensors.  Between the LED and the sensors are two 'shades' mounted above the stylus which change the amount of light as the stylus vibrates.  These cartridges need a special "photo-stage" to replace the conventional phono-stage which is an additional expense.

Australian prices including photo-stages range from AUD-2,150 for the DS-E1 to the DS Master 3 at approximately AUD-40,800, which is a bit outside my price range!  Where is the sweet spot?

What other way-out designs are there?

richardbrand

The much wanted Service pulled the Plug on dealing with the UK, things got very messy at Brexit. 

Pre Brexit purchases were arriving at peoples doors with demands for near £100 fees to have the goods made available. Loads of purchases were left with the Postal Services. It is also from recollection, an occurrence that when the EU Vendor could be contacted, the same requests for monies was being sent. Carpet Baggers and unscrupulous services rode the confusion until their intentions were seen as futile. Hence mainland EU retracted from dealing with sending items to the UK that was typical to them prior to Brexit.

For the UK to export living animals, the Paper Trail to be produced for each export, was not achievable in a sensible time line. The activity was more than bordering on cruelty, as animals were contained in transport vehicles for substantially increased period than ever known.

Northern Irish Businesses that exported Elvers to mainland Europe in the Millions went Bankrupt very quickly, as each young Eel needed individual Paperwork and proven traceability.

Anybody who travelled regular in the EU, especially those with second homes, or long term deals done for accommodation, who could qualify through Hereditary for a non British Passport, acquired Passports for EU and non EU Countries, as traveling in mainland EU was to much freer than being British. This methodology spread like wildfire for multiples of UK residents wanting to got to the remaining  EU.

My own EU Properties are not visited for multiple years, which is a sad case to be attached to. 

I made some anagrams of the names of a couple of our most verbose posters, but thought it would probably be deleted.

Some decades ago on usenet there was a mantra: post quality, not quantity.

As a professional I am a fire fighter for Companies that work in Construction Projects where Package Values typically exceeds £50M, the projects that usually are the structures that create a City Scape for a Major City.

When I am introduced there are usually forensic analysts of the Contract and Programme with a regular reporting to the Groups most senior personnel.

My role is to undo all the blockers and give description of what is the causes of the project arriving in the current state, and what is the proposed methodologies to be pro-active and efficient in rebuilding momentum to complete the contract obligations.

My input is never a one liner, unless a one liner is only necessary to clearly state how the overall has been influenced on.

My reward is, on occasions my descriptions when used as an evidence in a situation requiring the legal system to resolve. Is almost a recital by the Judge to describe why the Company is to be compensated by the non payer.

I write how I write because it works. Maybe not for the very small group who are the regular contributors to the Gon's Analog section, but to those who choose to read without bias, those who are not participant in using their words for projecting negative content towards another that they choose to connect with. 

As stated, the occasional PM received from a Gon Member with a long membership and no posts or a very recent member with no posts, requesting clarification or further guidance is my encouragement to remain on the Gon's Analogue Section.

Other Gon Sections are not so noticeable for their dysfunctionality between the regular contributors, as the Gon Analog Section is.    

 

 

pindac

3,727 posts

 

@audphile1 I’m sure you are really trying to state, "I did not need another prolix reply to read through"
 

@pindac ahem…no not really.

I asked gemini to give me the word count and summarize your post. 
Word count: 1150

Gemini summary:

This essay argues that while Electromagnetic (Moving Coil/Magnet) cartridges are governed by predictable, linear physics, Optical Read cartridges face a fundamental "Achilles’ Heel": the inherent nonlinearity of photocells.

The Comparison:

• Electromagnetic: Highly predictable and measurable. While assembly precision affects distortion, performance is consistent enough to use standardized RIAA correction and enhancement tools (like the Ortofon FSE).

• Optical: While they benefit from high-end materials (Boron/Diamond cantilevers), the photocells vary wildly from unit to unit. Because their behavior is nonlinear and inconsistent, the author argues that each individual cartridge technically requires bespoke, custom-tuned circuitry to perform optimally.

Conclusion:

The author concludes that the optical cartridge market overlooks this lack of consistency, whereas traditional electromagnetic designs remain superior for those seeking predictable, calculable precision in audio reproduction.

Would you like me to create a bulleted list of the specific technical pros and cons mentioned for each cartridge type?