As a professional I am a fire fighter for Companies that work in Construction Projects where Package Values typically exceeds £50M, the projects that usually are the structures that create a City Scape for a Major City.
When I am introduced there are usually forensic analysts of the Contract and Programme with a regular reporting to the Groups most senior personnel.
My role is to undo all the blockers and give description of what is the causes of the project arriving in the current state, and what is the proposed methodologies to be pro-active and efficient in rebuilding momentum to complete the contract obligations.
My input is never a one liner, unless a one liner is only necessary to clearly state how the overall has been influenced on.
My reward is, on occasions my descriptions when used as an evidence in a situation requiring the legal system to resolve. Is almost a recital by the Judge to describe why the Company is to be compensated by the non payer.
I write how I write because it works. Maybe not for the very small group who are the regular contributors to the Gon's Analog section, but to those who choose to read without bias, those who are not participant in using their words for projecting negative content towards another that they choose to connect with.
As stated, the occasional PM received from a Gon Member with a long membership and no posts or a very recent member with no posts, requesting clarification or further guidance is my encouragement to remain on the Gon's Analogue Section.
Other Gon Sections are not so noticeable for their dysfunctionality between the regular contributors, as the Gon Analog Section is.