This is what happens when you have an executive that doesn’t care and a yes-man that would execute any command and do anything to kiss ass.
No one cared about sound quality. They couldn’t have. Otherwise this would never leave the factory. Who in their right mind would approve something like this.
Led Zeppelin II on vinyl
How good or bad are the remastered versions?
This in example…
https://store.acousticsounds.com/d/96600/Led_Zeppelin-Led_Zeppelin_II-180_Gram_Vinyl_Record
I know it’s a digital remaster. Worth getting or should I hunt down a reasonably priced (if there is such a thing) US 1969 pressing?
Any thoughts from Zeppelin fans? What versions are good sounding? Not looking to pay obscene amounts of money for this…thanks!
- ...
- 94 posts total
Next mission- RL cut of Houses of the Holy. https://www.discogs.com/release/577498-Led-Zeppelin-Houses-Of-The-Holy The goal- collection of at least LZ I thru Houses maybe...Physical Graffitti in period stampers with minimal wallet damage. Took me many years of bin diving and luck.
|
@tablejockey on my list |
Curiosity got the better of me and I bought a Jimmy Page remaster of Physical Graffiti. I listened to the original US pressing (not sure what iteration/version) but the original didn’t sound great. The digitally remastered vinyl is clearer, has bigger sound, better bass but it’s undeniably a digital remaster. They didn’t kill the raw feel so that is good. It’s overall an enjoyable listen. |
- 94 posts total