I bought the second pressing, which, according to the story, was mastered from a cassette. And after hearing the sound quality yes it does sound like a cassette and not a very good one either.
But it’s not a big deal it was only $30. What hurts is the beat up copy I have is THE one to have - it is the first pressing RL. It’s still playable on side 2 but side 1 as I mentioned earlier, has a good size scratch.
The sound of the RL is not just the best you ever heard Zeppelin, it’s probably the best Rock & Roll recorded album. Period.
Led Zeppelin II on vinyl
How good or bad are the remastered versions?
This in example…
https://store.acousticsounds.com/d/96600/Led_Zeppelin-Led_Zeppelin_II-180_Gram_Vinyl_Record
I know it’s a digital remaster. Worth getting or should I hunt down a reasonably priced (if there is such a thing) US 1969 pressing?
Any thoughts from Zeppelin fans? What versions are good sounding? Not looking to pay obscene amounts of money for this…thanks!
- ...
- 94 posts total
Next mission- RL cut of Houses of the Holy. https://www.discogs.com/release/577498-Led-Zeppelin-Houses-Of-The-Holy The goal- collection of at least LZ I thru Houses maybe...Physical Graffitti in period stampers with minimal wallet damage. Took me many years of bin diving and luck.
|
@tablejockey on my list |
Curiosity got the better of me and I bought a Jimmy Page remaster of Physical Graffiti. I listened to the original US pressing (not sure what iteration/version) but the original didn’t sound great. The digitally remastered vinyl is clearer, has bigger sound, better bass but it’s undeniably a digital remaster. They didn’t kill the raw feel so that is good. It’s overall an enjoyable listen. |
- 94 posts total

