Wifi vs hardwired for streaming

@pcolvin I agree that a wired connection is preferable, but this is not an ABSOLUTE statement.  It depends entirely on your gear and your environment.  I get EXACTLY the same low error rate and retransmission rate with both my eero mesh network (6 radio-routers in my mesh, line of sight between the long runs, and sparse channel usage -ie, ration congestion- in my rural location) --as I do with my cat 6 wired direct from the ISPs router in my home.  When I say exact, the numbers vary over time but statistically equivalent.  This is the ONLY factor I care about in the transmission of streaming data or any other internet usage, as the protocols take care of everything else.

The question here in this thread was "is one better".  Again, it will vary according to your network gear and your environment.  

I'll say again, "audio grade" is complete nonsense when it comes to networking.  You are overpaying for a lesser solution THAN an "air gap" or galvanic isolation just before the audio input.  

this subject has been covered ad nauseum here on this forum

just do a search

@vicweast You can’t even compare your Eero network to that average consumer, as most Eero packages are 3 units, and if they’re the dual-band units they can’t operate at full speed on all APs unless you run ethernet backhauls between them. Not sure what model you have, but an Eero Max 7 Tri-band WiFi 7 3-piece system, which includes an internal 6Ghz backhaul, sells for $1700, and are the size of Netgear Orbi’s. A Pro-6E set is $450 for 3, which means about $900 for 6, usually beyond the price point for the average consumer. 

The point I’m trying to make is that your mesh system can’t be used to as a comparison piece against  the results that the average consumer gets who may not have the wiring or the line-of-site availability. I know for a fact that a 3-set Eero can’t work in my house, unless I have 6 of them, because some of my internal walls were built with double-sided insulation (I’m now using TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 Decos).

@pcolvin yes it is expensive, and yes I have 5 in my house an additional 2 "all weather" outside and one in my workshop (woodworker etc hobbies).  

...But the Eero's aren't the point, I previously used 3 multi-antenna routers in my previous home.  Couple of hundred dollars, so...  Why the Eero's? Easier to maintain a reliable and SAFE network.  Cat-something is much cheaper, but labor intensive to wire a home.  Today, starting from scratch: I would absolutely run fiber with a couple of WAPs where it makes sense.  

The best way really to set up a home network is to use the big bandwidth where performance is key (less and less important with the advances in wireless) but to also SEGREGATE your network into purpose-specific sub-nets (in both senses): Such as, a dedicated "link" (wireless subnet on a dedicated channel, or fiber, or Cat-something) from the ISP router to these different sub-nets.  For instance, a home office with multiple inter-communicating devices should not be contending with traffic for the TV or streaming.

You are 2 weeks late...