Why not acoustic suspension?

Smaller spaces, smaller enclosures, easier stocking/shipping, customers can fit them in their vehicles, larger sounding, greater range in specs, separate stands, separate self-powered subs, I think a combo of advantages is why so many makers are using ports, and I suspect many younger people have never even heard fully sealed designs.

I gave my JSE Model IIs to my son, they were too big for his wife, so he gave them to a mutual friend, who enjoys living in an old firehouse he bought and converted. They sound awesome there. He got a 2nd pair. Another friend took my advice and got a pair in his large room.

So, after I'm gone, and after Donna's gone, or if she moves after I'm gone and is willing/needing to part with them, my son is not going to want my awesome sounding speakers, and while my son has a TT, and some LP's, I doubt that he is going to want all the CDs and LP's either. 

Maybe my son's friend will want them, he brings his equipment and music here frequently, loves their sound, he has room to swap them in/out, and he's 27 years younger than Donna and me.

Your 15" closed boxes are just that but they are NOT acoustic suspension. Acoustic suspension is closed box.. The reverse may not be true and your boxes are not acoustic suspension.

All closed boxes can have superior bass damping if properly designed. Acoustic suspension adds a smaller box for similar bass response at the cost of lower efficiency.

As I implied previously, though, a good closed box has superior fidelity to a goo ported box. Ported boxes(including passive radiators) are boom boxes compared to closed boxes assuming proper design.

But closed boxes can boom. A well known example is the BBC LS3/5A which is way under damped albeit for a logical reason.

@mitch2 Looks like a 2270. Had one of those back in the day. Drove a pair of Rectilinear 3’s. But those were ported. 

@dynamiclinearity 

Are you saying this was never an acoustic suspension design?

I think of any sealed air tight enclosure as Acoustic Suspension. What am I missing?

It is not always about a smaller enclosure: bass extension can be improved by getting more sealed cubic inches than the original smaller compartments in the original Fisher Console, and then an optional Vent was added. I used the vent open when the speakers were located with a fully open room behind them (no longer Acoustic Suspension). They sounded muddy when I moved here with a wall several feet behind them, so I sealed the vents closed, in my mind back to Acoustic Suspension.

The drivers started out in ’smaller’ sealed compartments (no vents or ports) within my Uncle Johnny’s Fisher President II. It was up on 8" high bronze legs, the woofers fired downwards. The 15W Woofer did what it could in those many cubic inches.

https://www.audiogon.com/systems/11420

1st move: I had identical sized separate cabinets made, in white oak, with chrome tubes for an 8" high open base (anybody remember ’abstracta’?), the woofers still firing down. I simply moved the original front panel with two horns mounted, new fabric wrap. 

2nd Move, to change to front firing woofers, I had a taller pair of English Brown Oak cabinets made, woofers now front firing, no vent or port, a small increase in sealed volume, thus theoretically a bit more bass extension, and better imaging from the front firing bass and bass overtones.

I just found the drawings I made for the current Rosewood enclosures. Those enclosures are air tight sealed enclosures, OA 36" h; 20" w; 19" d.

Width to fit the 15" woofer became 20; depth of woofer in front of the optional port in the back panel behind it, avoid square, became 19", and ’not too high’ but more cubic inches, we chose 36" with a net volume (deducting the port’s volume) of 6.01 cu ft.

The optional 3D rectangular port (not visible, it’s built into the removable back panel) (10" w x 5-7/8" h x 4-7/8" deep) was designed with the help of Electro-Voice Engineers who were still in NYC. Use it closed, or open. It is sealed air tight now. 

Eliot, your speakers are not acoustic suspension. With the port sealed they are closed box but not acoustic suspension. A closed box is acoustic suspension when the air in a sealed box has a significant affect on controlling the woofer. If the woofer works in a ported box the spider controls the driver moving in and out and  air affect in the box is minimal. Acoustic suspension occurs when the air in the box is necessary to restore the woofer to neutral. It implies a soft spider that can't do the job on its own. Even if the box is closed and the spider controls the woofer it still isn't acoustic suspension; it's just closed box.

The problem with the nomenclature occurred because in the 60s acoustic suspension was 2/3 of the market. When Thiele/Small did the math so reflex boxes could be designed on paper without guessing like it was before acoustic suspension went out of favor. But since acoustic suspension at one time was almost all closed boxes people forgot that it wasn't a synonym for closed box and recalled the popularity of the term acoustic suspension and started using the terms interchangeably in correctly. Edgar Vilchur who founded Acoustic Research and along with others, especially Henry Kloss made acoustic suspension popular would be rolling in their graves at the misunderstanding. If you understand math set theory acoustic suspension is a PROPER subset of closed box.