Actually, you’re assuming facts not in evidence, which is that the OP has never listened to Wilsons. That’s unclear me. But, for the sake of argument let’s assume that’s the case. My example of car enthusiasts is a great analogy. You can take a look at power and torque curves and have a very good idea of how a car will drive in certain conditions (i.e., straight line acceleration). It’s really easy to see why a stock VW Golf R benefits from an APR stage 1 tune, just by looking at one set of curves.
In your criticisms of the OP, you’ve never once addressed his fundamental point, which is that there’s a consistent 5 db dip in the response curve that shouldn’t be there. You could simply say that measurements don’t matter, and they sound great to you. Instead, you’ve attacked the OP from your very first post. It’s pretty transparent, and really pathetic.

