Who Uses KIRMUSS Restoration System?

@petaluman 

Many machines can mount and spin 12"10" 7" lps,; some slots on the tops are size specific regarding size and quantity, Kirmuss makes a poing of not having more than 3 in order to keep them spaced so the bubbles can get between them.

if you mean the chemicals safe/effective for materials78’s are made from, I suggest you ask others, including Kirmuss, and 

member lnitm, OP of this related discussion:

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/kirmuss-ultrasonic-vinyl-cleaner

if you ’search discussions’ (search box top of window), you will get many like this

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/how-best-to-clean-old-78s?highlight=clean%2B78s

Hi,

I have used it for years. No need to go through all the steps unless the LPs have been previously been treated with chemicals. All my vinyl were treated with 2 sessions of 5 min and dried off. All clean and sound fine. I didn’t see the point of the whole procedure as it wasn’t needed. Of course his business model is the procedure combined with the liquids he sells. The unit is like a printer and the money is made with the ink…

...use his spray to change the polarity of my solution...

Really? How?

@dogberry 

from Kirmuss site

"Since both the water and record have the same slight negative charge, water with or without a cleaning solution added in an ultrasonic’s tank with a record spinning cannot see any sonic action in the record’s grooves. Like charges repel, which is why the Kirmuss process sees the record subjected to multiple cycles as the ionizing spray that is applied to the record only temporarily changes the charge of a record to a positive. As the record spins, the charge is reduced. By reapplying the ionizing spray prior to introduction into the sonic’s tank, the opposite charge returns, stripping out films left over by prior cleaning methods then the release agent itself (Shure in the 1970s called this a “pressing oil”)."

............................................

so I have been wondering how to get a Positive charge in my mix when I do my manual and vigorous scrub

I could buy and use Kirmuss mix, expensive, or, as discussed in this subsequent discussion, buy and add a bit of glycol to my mix.

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/kirmuss-ultrasonic-vinyl-cleaner

this stuff, costs only $0.60/oz?

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C4W8S79G/ref=sspa_dk_detail_3?psc=1&sp_csd=d2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9kZXRhaWw

Since both the water and record have the same slight negative charge, water with or without a cleaning solution added in an ultrasonic’s tank with a record spinning cannot see any sonic action in the record’s grooves.

Is this man seriously suggesting that ultrasonic cleaners do not and cannot work because "water and record have the same slight negative charge"?

You don't have to be a herpetologist to see what kind of liquid is being sold here.