I have not attempted this, but my thoughts are this is a lot of effort for mixed results.
Whether it’s jitter or power, the order of power supply/de-jitter devices really matters. At the end it’s often hard to tell you’ve made any improvement, and often you’ve swapped one kind of noise for another.
For instance, with anti-jitter devices, the device itself may have more jitter than your original device had natively. With a UPS, sine wave generation (i.e. the inverter) may leave high frequency or EMI/RFI noise on the line.
The ideal situation IMHO is when a power supply does additional buffering inside itself. For instance, the Krell fully balanced amplifiers or the Sander’s Magtech. That way the engineer knows that the direction of noise reduction and current availability is constantly going in the right direction.
Personally I go for Furman with voltage regulation (AR) and series mode protection for this reason exactly. It goes from unregulated AC from 110 to 140 V (or something like that) and delivers a stable 120V +- 3VAC, which then feeds the noise and surge filtering. No additional EMI/RFI introduced, and my downstream power suplies get pampered with a reliable AC source.
My advice is to minimize the layers of power conditioning and make sure you keep particularly noisy sources OUT of the cleaned power. For instance, if you have a very expensive power conditioner, don't put your PC's power supply on it. Keep it separate, maybe on it's own UPS or surge strip. If you put it on the post-conditioned side you run the risk of injecting noise to an AC source that's already been cleaned.
