What does “musicality” really mean?


After 50+ years in this hobby, I realised that many reviewers use musicality to describe a warm system. Warmth often comes from extra even-order harmonics, softer transients, and a bit of mid-bass lift. Pleasant for vocals, but it can also hide detail and affect timing, especially with strings and percussion.

 

I also found that “sterile” sound usually points to room issues or system matching, not the recording. Engineers don’t master music to sound lifeless.

 

These days, if I want warmth, I just play music that naturally has it, instead of relying on equipment to add coloration.

 

hkcharlie
Post removed 

To me musicality means way more than warmth in a system.  It means an involving clarity and coherency with lush timbre and vibrancy, and an easy to listen to natural quality that reminds me of real acoustic instruments and voices.  Free of the box noises and other aberrations that draw attention to the system instead of the music.  When the system can trick my mind into thinking there's music in front of me, it's musical. 

Musicality needs to start with the recording.  If a recording is not good you end up focusing on the sound and its imperfections more than the music and it’s distracting.  Assuming a good recording, musicality to me means getting effortlessly lost in the music and the performance.  Balance is key — if anything sticks out it detracts from believability, naturalness, and ultimately musicality.  That said, I think this can vary greatly by listener and individual preferences but the goal remains the same — the ability to get effortlessly lost in the performance.  To me, that’s the Holy Grail of high-end audio and ultimately what it’s all about.  So a system that sounds perfectly musical to me, using this definition, might sound overly warm or sterile to someone else, but that’s what makes the audio world go round.  That’s my take on it anyway.