![]()

![Front. Thelonious Monk with John Coltrane [LP].](https://pisces.bbystatic.com/image2/BestBuy_US/images/products/30968a17-9861-478c-8505-8c155945eb0d.jpg;maxHeight=1920;maxWidth=900?format=webp)
Share some under appreciated jazz album titles
I’ve been on a journey to discover more older jazz albums deeper down the catalog that share two traits; I like/love the music and the recording shines, quite possibly unexpectedly. By that I mean, I probably have a bias that leads me expect recordings from the fifties and sixties to be less detailed or “audiophile” than more recent recordings. I’m finding this bias to be truly misguided to say the least.
Please share some of your favorite lesser known jazz gems with both traits. To roll the ball… Dave Brubeck “In Time”, Johnny Hodges “Not So Dukish” and “Gerry Mulligan Meets Johnny Hodges”
Yes, I’ve been on a Johnny Hodges kick lately
happy listening everyone
- ...
- 116 posts total
@yogiboy, You (are) killing the game! Now for those of you who may not know, in jazz terms, when speaking of a negative it actually means it is a positive. Well, most of the time anyway. |
Anyway i dont trust the "taste" of people unable to explain why a jazz album matter for them.. I dont ask for objective characterisation and opinions but at least for subjective one too ...
I realized i liked a Jazz album when i discovered Louis Armstrong "sun" voice and playing, i was 14 or 15,but for me it was not "jazz", it was unique genius... Then i listened to "petite fleur " at 20, i was stunned by Sydney Bechet playing near to Baker future albums i will explore not as "jazz" but as music played by geniuses ... I forgot about jazz for 20 years, then i discovered Chet Baker, his playing and voice melodic mastery were for me the "moon" reflecting the "sun" (Armstrong)... Then by increment i discovered jazz very slowly... i was mainly in classical, Indian and sacred choral music history...
Without explanation what it means if i recommend a particular Chet Baker album ? Nothing ... An infinite list of names threw here without motives, especially long one is beyond useless and preposterous...
|
l know where you are in thought about this. l like jazz and the genius behind improvised music. True jazz to me means a performance not written down, pure, a one off performance that will never be repeated (because there are no rules and it’s not a written document prompting a performance) l liken jazz to avant-garde improvised experimental music. Most people dislike both of these because of sometimes no melody or logical construction. It’s a jam session.l think that’s why most of the general public reject both these musical forms. l would venture a third type of music, more modern that’s evaded by a large proportion of listeners….. rap. I just don’t get it either. To my ears in most cases, rap resembles a rollercoaster cacophany of words at high speed that just can’t be absorbed, or easily followed by many listeners. It’s like trying continually to catch up with a runaway train. |
- 116 posts total

