While I’m no fan of Rolling Stone and believe any “top” list is purely subjective, I did enjoy reading the individual narratives written by various artists.
Rolling Stones list of top 100 music artist , I ?Question its logic
Please take a look how can this be. ERIC CLAPTON RATED AT #55, PINK FLOYD LOWER 50s , THE DOORS at #41 , is it me or is ROLLING STONE 🥜 NUTS ?
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-lists/100-greatest-artists-147446/eric-clapton-5-88208/
- ...
- 23 posts total
Rolling Stone stopped being a music magazine many decades ago; it's become a cultural, political, and news publication since then. Music is in there as part of the culture, but it's not their primary focus. Still very popular, still well-read, just not among older people who used to regard it as some kind of music bible. |
@larsman et al, |
@dgd - good points, but the content of Rolling Stone that I subscribed to from '68 - '73 was probably about 90% music. When they moved from San Francisco to New York, that started to change, to where today it is closer to 90% NOT music. 'All the news that fits' was an ironically humorous take on the New York Times' 'All the news that's fit to print'. |
All true. Yes, Wenner tried to inject a little mainstream publishing vibe into RS from the beginning. They were just kids having some fun, then morphed into serious business as RS "matured." |
- 23 posts total

