I actually did follow chatGPT recommendations on my speaker placement. A combination of placement, distance from listening position & front wall, speaker width & toe in, plugging one of two rear ports, top on one, bottom on other, changing port tubes, & equalizing my sub via a miniDSP, I was able to achieve a flat response & great soundstage & imagining in an asymmetrical room.
Speaker Placement - Frequent Placement Changes?
Curious about members and the frequency of speaker placement changes. Do you frequently explore or do you “set it and forget it”?
This includes toe-in, rake, distance from walls and main listening position (MLP), etc.
I find myself revisiting every few months, and always receiving an education about my not-so-perfect acoustic living environment - bass null about 12” in front of MLP for example.
.
- ...
- 44 posts total
My experience is similar to the comments by joeycastillo that REW is a great benefit to provide objective information to optimize placement. Prior to this I was constantly chasing adjustments which, I'm sure, in many cases were not real. I also used REW for upgrading my acoustic treatments. It's quite amazing how seemingly minor changes in both treatment and speaker placement show up in REW profiles and RT60 data. |
Agree, REW, painters tape, laser measuring tool, and room treatments (if able) are all wonderful tools. For some, and if their component allow, digital room correction (rather room mitigation) can be a game changer - I have my personal thoughts from experience, but I’ll just say that I prefer a more organic approach using a combination of furniture and treatments throughout the space. I also agree that AI and ChatGPT can be useful - curious where this will go in relation to room acoustics and speaker/listener placement and whether new programs will be created; something like DIRAC + AI. From what I’m gathering, it seems like a good portion of users are “set it and forget it” after finding ideal placement, which makes sense. I would imagine having a dedicated space would likely be a factor in this equation whereas users like myself may need to tweak and experiment with their shared living/acoustic spaces. Not to get too far into the weeds since this is just personal experience, but I’ve found adding a second subwoofer, spacing the speakers closer together (preferred tonality), bringing the speakers further into the room, and bass traps to be the greatest impact so far for me. And +1 tcutter |
I advocate having flexibility to alter toe-in for one centered listener, and two off-center listeners, using DBX Crossfield Dispersion Method https://www.audiogon.com/systems/11516 2. Single Listener: tweeters each side aimed at listening position. To keep volume of narrow dispersion high frequencies relative to volume of mids and upper bass
3. Two Listeners: use DBX Cross Dispersion Method: right tweeters aimed at left listener; left tweeters aimed at right listener. Result: wide decent enjoyable imaging, each listener hears ’enough’ of the opposite side. |
- 44 posts total

