What Does 80 Grand Get You Nowadays?


A system was playing in a shop. I sat down and pretty soon I thought gosh, I’m glad my system sounds better than this.

That system - just preamp, amp, and speakers - cost about $80,000 new.

I didn’t make the speakers at first, because Sabrinas look far better than the usual Wilson house look. They were driven by one of those new high-end Marantz amps, and I don’t think that was a match made in heaven. The Marantz was driven by a Dan D’Agostino pre that looked like a Minion had been crushed in a hydraulic press. Audiophile music was streaming, but I did not catch whence issued those dulcet ones and zeroes.

I suppose that system constitutes high-end for some. Now, it certainly sounded competent, but it also sounded boring. I thought, this is the Audi SUV of audio: competent and boring.

Conversely, I was impressed and pleased to no end that the end sound of my modest system from the last century could play in the same league as an almost-six figure modern system, and do so in a more engaging and fun fashion - to my ears, at least.

I’m biased, of course; and I am certain many high-priced systems out there leave mine in the dust. Still, I would have thought $80,000 guaranteed a better baseline sound.

How about you, have you heard a lot of gear whose sound was way out of whack with its price?

 

devinplombier

High end marantz is like jumbo shrimp. An oxymoron. Marantz sound is rolled off and constipated. I’ve not heard or seen a marantz amp paired with Wilson speakers. Ever. And to find someone driving a marantz with d’agostino is odd at best. 

I’m not going to even ask what streaming front end was feeding that Frankenstein of a system. 
 

You said it was a shop. Was it a pawn shop. Whoever set that system up is on drugs. 

Every day on Audiogon you can find a post that will just lift your spirits up after a tough day at work. I can always rely on this. Thank you people!