@faustuss thanks, those look like incredible specs.
Now that I replaced the tubes my MHA200 sounds dynamic. I didn't realize how problematic my custom 12AU7/FET headphone amp was; now I'm enjoying all sorts of less-than-pefect recordings again.
is McIntosh known for good dynamics?
I'm mainly a classical listener. I love good dynamics and dynamic resolution. For instance, in classical music there is a lot of musical expression that comes through subtle dynamic changes from one phrase to the next. There are also sudden louds, which the equipment should present as having startle impact. There are also sudden quiets, which should have a "compelling" sense to them.
I'm wondering if the McIntosh signature sound is known for good dynamics and microdynamics.
@faustuss thanks, those look like incredible specs. Now that I replaced the tubes my MHA200 sounds dynamic. I didn't realize how problematic my custom 12AU7/FET headphone amp was; now I'm enjoying all sorts of less-than-pefect recordings again.
|
I don't believe Mac amps are most well known for their dynamic sound. However it depends on the component type and era. The newer power amplifiers are nicely dynamic if driven with a clean high gain preamp, preferably a class A triode tube pre. The reason is that they made an effort to increase the capacitance of the dynamic storage caps.
|
@magon Happy it's all working out for you and you enjoyed the review. Carry on!
|
My first high-end system was just A few years ago I chose the Macintosh MA9000 integrated with focal kanta3 speakers, Puritan power conditioner Shenyatta Delta speaker cables, I just had to have more and I upgrade it I'm glad I did. Macintosh has a very warm sound and it is different I end up getting a more higher resolution more detail stereo amplifier with preamp ( Separates) I'm glad I did I'm not saying that the Macintosh sounded bad It served me well for almost 2 years I just needed something with more detail and more dynamics. |