Source of Fremer's "1 arc second" claim?


In the latest TAS April 2025, page 34, Fremer reviews some Technics TT, and repeats his claim that "listeners in blind tests could hear arc second speed shifts". where one revolution ~1.3 million arc seconds. Anybody have any idea where this is coming from?

Basic math will make you wonder whether any listener can hear a difference between chamber a' = 440.00000 Hz and 440.00004 Hz, rounding the 1.3M to an even 1M. When tuning my violins, I can hear 2–3 cent difference, where 800 cents = 1 octave = doubling of frequency. At 2 cents, that is over 1 full Herz difference. Even playing a cord with tones at 1 Hz difference will result in an oscillation at 1 Hz, i.e. peak to peak 1 second. For easy math, assume even a 0.00005 difference, which would lead to an oscillation with frequency of 20,000 seconds = 33 minutes. Good luck hearing that. 

"Golden Ears" being able to hear ten times better than a normal human, why not. But 20K better? We are off by several orders of magnitude. Maybe I don't understand that he is talking about, but I consider it complete BS.

Maybe it has to do with consistency (accuracy vs. precision), but then the a different unit needs to be used that includes time in the denominator. But even then the math/physics don't add up.

If anybody can provide any insights, LMK. Thanks!

The alternative is rather unflattering for Mr. Fremer.

oberoniaomnia

The 1 arc second claim likely is a quote from a turntable designer - likely a direct drive designer because they like to claim superior speed accuracy to all else.

I call it marketing bs or smoke and mirrors.

The boffins would claim it to be quantum entanglement.

 

There is a lot of unsubstantiated hyperbole (read: bs) in reviews. If you've been in the hobby any length of time, you already know this.

Precisely why his initials are MF.

Regards,

barts

Did I just join the nasty posters club?

 

"I can hear 2–3 cent difference"

oberoniaonia-

I'm with you on ability to hear subtle differences.

I play my guitar along with my favorite artist on LP, and find by way of the tuner, recordings are sometimes a couple of cents higher/lower than A440. Maybe that's the inaccuracy of my table,the recording...who knows?

Anyway, it's a way to REALLY hear if your turntable is speed steady- play the same chord against the LP to hear accuracy.

My setup gets a B+. Maybe an A- on good days.I hear wavering, not pronounced, but not accurate. 

It's not a $50K+ rig, so my blood pressure isn't redlining.

 

@barts I did not catch the alternative for the initials. Too funny! That, however, was not my intention.

@fatdaddy2 totally agree. Frequently a kernel of truth is augmented by acres of BS. Just was wondering what the source kernel might have been for 1 arc second. 

@tablejockey funny anecdote! 

Maybe that's the inaccuracy of my table,the recording...who knows?

Lots of factors, indeed. There is a general trend of pitch creep, with contemporary players going for a' = 444 Hz. 

@lewm 1 rpm = 3% = 4 cents which anything other than a manual gramophone can beat by a wide margin.