@ghdprentice : What DAC's from the early years of digital sound "hideous"? Inquiring minds want to know!
- ...
- 106 posts total
I agree that most DACs $500+ sound good. What matters now is synergy with DAC and the rest of the system. My Benchmark DAC3B which is bright on top is incredible on my warm RAAL VM-1a tube headphone amp. Not so great on more neutral gear I have owned. I had the $24k Playback Designs Dream DAC in my sights but I had a nagging feeling it was not the best way to elevate the overall system since there are a lot of great DACs for a lot cheaper. I spent that money on my amp, a CODA #16, which was a very wise move. I got a Schitt Yggi+ OG DAC which has me totally happy with the DAC ($2800) and the PBD Dream is long forgotten.
The Benchmark DAC1 is hideous compared to today’s DACs. I owned it for a long time, as well as the DAC2, DAC3 HGC.
|
@audioman58 Great choice! I have considered the same one when I upgraded from the (Swiss) Merason Frérot. But then decided for the (French) Métronome Le Dac 2 which sounded a little better to my ears. |
My subjective observation is yes, but... Around 2000 DAC's universally improved how well they played Redbook. The days of big jumps in sound quality between a 44.1/16 bit recording and 96/24 have all but vanished with only very small differences probably brought on by the digital filters. Can you still make a terrible DAC? Not sure, but while the Topping D90 (or whatever I have in a box) measures great I don't listen to it for long. |
- 106 posts total

