@roxy54 It's hyperbole but not kidding. It's my limited experience, I know it's not comprehensive.
- ...
- 14309 posts total
- 14309 posts total
@roxy54 It's hyperbole but not kidding. It's my limited experience, I know it's not comprehensive. |
jafant, Well I'm game. I'm willing to take the SE to where Tom believes it can go. Outboards, internal wiring, top level caps and resistors, binding posts, internal cabinet mods if needed. If there was a way to eliminate the binding posts I would go that route. Maybe a pigtail coming out of the 2.4 SE and hardwired/soldered into outboard. I'd desolder it if I need to move in future. Those brass binding post add a lot of harshness. Giving up the convenience of binding post to have a more purist approach by eliminating them is worth it to me and you get a sonic upgrade that costs nothing. |
Tom, At first look I thought they where a brass cylinder. then realized they were copper I watched the video. This would seem a much better option than any binding post out there. On 2.4 (SE) you would need 3 per speaker for each driver. If members here have never listened to a speaker without binding post and wired directly they will be surprised. Now you have me thinking from output of amp to input of outboard xover doing the same thing which would eliminate amp binding post and input of crossover. It would also eliminate speaker cable spades/banana connections. Your thoughts Tom? |