Audiophile sound quality from a more "mainstream" company?


I have owned some of the wellknown high-end  companies 

units. 

 

What I am wondering is have you had some success/good sound from some more mainstream, less high-end companies.?

jusam

When I bought a set of Heresy IVs to replace the IIIs I was impressed by the IVs better construction and thought the porting for 10hz lower frequency response was a great idea (although I use 2 REL subs in this heap, so...meh...). After listening to them for over a month with a frown (figured they were still breaking in), I narrowed the main issue down to an upper mid "honk" or aberration in piano music mostly as I listen to a lot of jazz piano trios. Man...I wanted them to be great, but put my trusty IIIs back in a realized how much better they sounded. More coherent, smoother...just better. Damn. I think the IIIs mid horn is simply better...titanium instead of plastic driver, more complex horn throat design...or something. Sold the IVs, still very much enjoying the IIIs.

Sony ES; Pioneer Elite; Technics (now, not the stuff they was making in the 1980's -- SL-1200 Series Turntables were the only exception).

--Charles--

I’ve had a Cambridge Audio Evo 150 for about a year now. .  My assessment is  it is very competitive and  in the same league in all regards. 

Are the following mainstream?

Rotel
NAD
B&W
Martin Logan
Klipsch
Dynaudio
Cambidge Audio

Some of them have over 100 million a year revenue