It is my belief that no one product based on its implementation and execution is designed for everyone. Regardless of what path we have chosen, the single most important thing in our selection is to access what we like in an audio product. Some audiophiles love to get their hands dirty and don’t mind if there’s an interruption in music playback while they figure out what’s wrong..LOL! Other audiophiles want nothing to do with such troubleshooting and configuration. We are blessed to be living in times where we get to enjoy access to infinite selection of music and gear, just pick your poison and be merry.
Has anyone used the new Innuos 2.0 Sense music app? Compared it to Roon?
Anyone know if Innuos Sense has a similar setting? I can’t seem to find it.
- ...
- 152 posts total
@musiclover1 Thats okay bet you have an Roon core also. |
@sns, other than CPU noise clocking matters at least as much. Depending on the connection chosen you need to either clock the dac in USB asynchronous mode or both dac and server with superior clocking through the same device. Unfortunately all connections between dac and server as well as clock connections have their own jitter/noise issues so that an optimisation only on the cpu is insufficient. Roon in most implementations adds a further device as you need renderer and server, further exacerbating the clocking issue. This is why current design thinking seems to converge to integrated server/dac/attenuator solutions with external power supplies |
@lalitk after I ran a 10k I had a mushroom omelet with a cup of herbal tea. Wink wink. |
- 152 posts total

