Primaluna. Evo 400 - bass issues


This will be long, I really need some help determining why I’m getting poor bass response. I’m pretty sure it’s this amp, the PrimaLuna Evo 400 power amp. I’ve been trying speakers with it with poor results. In the interim I’ve been using cheap Mackie MR5 studio monitors out of my preamp, the Evo 300. I’ve had great results with these and that is the problem. These are tiny 5” near field monitors and the bass response I’ve been getting is excellent. The bass has been so good I decide to try to find a bookshelf speaker that is similar as I like how they disappear and based on the bass I was getting from these I thought I’d be good to go. I listen to predominately jazz so I’m not looking for thunderous bass just enough to fill in the rhythm section and bass walks etc. These Mackie’s do that. With that said, they don’t compare in the mids and highs but the bass is there. Here are the specs on the Mackie: https://www.sonicelectronix.com/item-24164-Mackie-MR5.html

Equipment:

VPI Prime Signature, Hana ML, Herron VTPH-2a, Evo 300, Evo 400, Audioquest Niagara 1200. Stock tubes in the 400, Evo 300 has upgraded Psvane and 1960 Mullard rectifiers.

Room:

16.5 feet long 15 feet wide (room opens to the right another 12 feet) 8 feet ceiling

Mackie’s are 2 feet of the side wall and the back walls. I keep that for all the speakers I’ve tried.

Speakers I’ve tried:

Tannoy Turnberry’s

B&W 805

B&W 606

Ascend Acoustics Sierra 2EX

Probably my favorite were the 805 but there was no bass. With all of these speakers I found very minimaL bass response. I thought the Ascend would be good because of the impedance curve but they sounded the worst.

Personally I think the issue is the room, but then how am I getting good bass with the Mackie’s? So now I think it’s the amp. When I read about other peoples experiences with this amp bass doesn’t seem to be an issue. What gives? Am I just use to the solid state monitors and how they provide bass vs tubes? Is it the room? Poor speaker matching? I recently had the 606’s over again as they are a friends that he uses in a surround setup. They really sounded nice but again poor bass and they are rated to go deeper than the Mackie’s.

Thanks for reading.

 

 

 

 

 

jazzjunkie80923

Another PL and no bass thread.

PL user, and very long time ear witness of bass performance in many setups. Both PL and non PL tube/SS.

The PL with the stock EL34’s output plenty of bass. I have heard the OP’s combo of PL/Tannoy-no shortage of bass.

Mystery PL no bass problem thread of the week.

Edit- My experience of hearing PL/Tannoy was with an EARLIER PL generation(Dialogue Premium)-not EVO, which is purportedly even "better."

 

I had a tube integrated with the kt-120's in it and the bass was there but uncontrolled. I haven't heard a good tube amp < $10k that did bass well enough to move away from SS. The PSA BHK amp would blow away the PL, the Rogue, and other tube amps close to the price of the BHK. 

I also used the 4ohm tap to get better controlled bass from the tube amp.

Thanks for the replies.

Yes I’ve tried several positions with the speakers when they were here. Not one produced the response of the Mackie’s. 
 

In an attempt to further diagnose the issue I lugged the amp to a friends with a bigger room, better acoustics with treatment. Hadn’t been able to hook up in the past as he is a ways away. Amp performed the the same. Put it up against his BHK 250. It’s the amp. Still sounds lovely but the low end is not there for me. I’ll list her for sale. Thanks for the replies. 

Audioquest Niagara is known to limit bass. Plug into the wall and see if you get improvement.

Also you're using speakers that aren't very sensitive.  You will see problems first in the bass area.  

Jerry

Carlsbad,

I don’t believe that is true. But nothing wrong with trying the amp plugged into the wall.

jazzjunkie80923,

Perhaps add a subwoofer(s) one that can be tuned to the room like a JL F-112,113

ozzy