The Beatles Revolver


Just read where Giles Martin is using  AI-powered audio separation technology to remix Revolver. From what I read he can take the mono tracks and separate all the instruments and vocals on the 4 track tape the were recorded on and then I guess remix them in 24 track or whatever he wants. Is this good? I love The Beatles and no matter how much better it my sound it not the same. They had what they had in 1966. And George Martin did wonders with 4 tracks. Where does this reissuing of classic albums stop. Is Revolver remixed in multi tracks still Revolver?

lenmc2964

vair68robert

 

Excellent! Most Audiophiles will discard those 1987 CDs.  Most of those discs are Flat transfers. Not a bad thing. The other Audiophiles will say, purchase the 2009 Remasters on CD.  
Besides my Bread Box, which is a very cool concept and design, I own the Disk Union Japan SHM- CD set. This particular set is a beautiful package that sits in my safe.  I believe it is comparable to your 1982 LP Japan set. Only newer technology.

 

Happy Listening!

Never thought I’d get this kind of response thank you all for posting. I received my single LP copy yesterday and it sounds very good. Still prefer my Mono copy but it sounds good. But I still ask is it still Revolver? Same songs but different album. But if it opens The Beatles music to a new audience I guess it a good thing. And now I have 92 albums by The Beat;es. 

Listened to the Atmos version on Tidal, crystal clear and fresh. Vocals and strings sound amazing.

Now I’m curious.  I’ve been thrilled by this album in any and every format I’ve heard it.  My most recent purchase was the 1971 UK vinyl reissue.  I loved it.  The best version I’d heard yet (still not yet heard an original).

I really enjoyed Giles’ “White Album” mastering.