I personally think that most "higher end" audio products do provide balanced connections. At the same time, I don’t think they’re actually needed in all cases, and the manufacturer is probably saving some money by not providing them. On the other hand, some manufacturers may be actually losing out on some sales by not providing them. Educated audiophiles should already know what they’re looking for when shopping for audio gear. If balanced ins and outs are a priority for you, well then that may limit your choices. Some are actually slow to jump on the XLR bandwagon, and realize their benefits, as balanced audio has been in the pro field for decades already, to the point it’s almost old technology now. Next up is Dante (which is already being heavily used in the pro field).
At this level of high(er) end audio why not offer balanced connections?
I am curious - and please, save us all time, refrain from speculation on this - why do companies persist in omitting balanced connections when it comes to high / higher end audio products?
I understand that when it comes to lower price point items manufacturers would not want the additional costs. But when many folks have higher end systems, why would an manufacturer not offer balanced connections?
Appreciate those with non-speculation replies.
- ...
- 36 posts total
Balanced is preferable for very long cable runs such as mono-block amplifiers that will be located next to speakers and away from the pre-amp and sources. Unless the component is truly balanced their is no point. As @carlsbad said you are making assumptions. If it is a short cable run then un-balanced is fine and the shorter the better. |
- 36 posts total