Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts


@crymeanaudioriver @amir_asr You are sitting there worrying if this or that other useless tweak like a cable makes a sonic difference.

I don’t worry about my equipment unless it fails. I never worry about tweaks or cables. The last time I had to choose a cable was after I purchased my first DAC and transport in 2019.  I auditioned six and chose one, the Synergistic Research Atmosphere X Euphoria. Why would someone with as fulfilling a life as me worry about cables or tweaks and it is in YOUR mind that they are USELESS.

@prof "would it be safe to say you are not an electrical designer or electrical engineer? If so, under what authority do you make the following comment" - concerning creating a high end DAC out of a mediocre DAC.

Well, I have such a DAC, built by a manufacturer of equipment and cables for his and my use. It beat out a $9,000 COS Engineering D1v and $5,000 D2v by a longshot. It is comparable to an $23,000 Meridian Ultradac. Because I tried all the latter three in comparison I say this with some authority, the authority of a recording engineer (me), a manufacturer (friend) and many audiophiles who have heard the same and came to the same conclusion.

Another DAC with excellent design engineer and inferior execution is the Emotiva XDA-2. No new audio board but 7! audiophile quality regulators instead of the computer grade junk inside, similar high end power and filter caps, resistors, etc. to make this into a high end DAC on the very cheap ($400 new plus about the same in added parts).

@russ69 We must be neighbors. I frequented Woodland Hills Audio Center back in the 70s and 80s. I heard several of Arnie’s speakers including a the large Infinity speakers in a home.

fleschler

So $2 DAC transparent enough? Or do one have to spend a lot more, like $50 Toppings DAC?

 

Some eye popping proof here: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/how-good-are-2-dacs

@djones51 

Definition of transparent

 

1a(1)having the property of transmitting light without appreciable scattering so that bodies lying beyond are seen clearly PELLUCID

(2)allowing the passage of a specified form of radiation (such as X-rays or ultraviolet light)

bfine or sheer enough to be seen through DIAPHANOUS

2afree from pretense or deceit FRANK

beasily detected or seen through OBVIOUS

creadily understood

dcharacterized by visibility or accessibility of information especially concerning business practices

 

@thyname what do the $1k, $10k, more $k do extra?

It is possible that there are things like pre ringing that may be happening which help the SINAD, but makes transient response differ.

So if that is happening, then a different test than what is done on ASR would be needed. Or the cheap ones and costly ones are the same, but we think that they are not.
We sort of need a way to determine:

  1. whether they output the same, or if the output differs
  2. and then one can discuss which sounds better.

We have not seemed to pass step #1 so far.
If we believe that step #2 is true, then figuring step #1 is still of some value (IMO).

@thyname  I'm not arguing with the ASR crown, that's why I'm on Audiogon.  I'm offering a superior built DAC/pre-amp with unique and attractive look that for CDs (probably even better for streaming), resembles the Benchmark L4 pre-amp.   44% of retail price.  Not for those who prefer a $2 DAC or a Topping.