The thing about objectivists is...


Listening is the essence and central activity of music appreciation. Listening is purely a result of the essential reality of subjectivity, and not that of any "objective reality" which is assumed to exist "out there." The human mind tends to rigidly cling to measurements, pedestrian concepts, and elaborate abstractions in attempt to simplify, subdivide, define, and categorize within the immensity of the realm of the experiential/subjective.

Over-reliance on concrete definitions and ideas serves to attach oneself to a sense of stability and security. The mind secretly hopes this will sufficiently ward off the uneasiness of feeling unsure, or off-balance, about one’s actual degree of comprehension regarding a given topic.

But what is it that is capable of registering sounds, recognition of patterns, recalling memory, and awareness? It’s pure subjectivity. It’s not the brain. That’s only an idea which is based on an entire system of definitions which define other definitions. The mind fortifies the boundaries of its interconnected structure by using circuitously self-reifying definitions.

Consider this: A description of a thing, proposed by the human mind, is only of that which a thing is not. A thing’s reality is not the same as its description.

What is it that is present in the pure silence during the instant just prior to sound waves propagating into the air space of the listening room? What is it which listens?

It’s subjective awareness, devoid of mental content. Your ideas aren’t listening, your experiential awareness is listening.

The more one thinks the same boring ideas one’s been thinking for years, the less one can listen. Subjectivity is the self-existent authority prior to the discernment of any quality, measured quantity, or the detection of that which we term "music". The deeper we can relax and sink into pure, silent subjectivity, the more deeply and purely we can listen and behold. Our subjective awareness becomes purer and less colored, our mind becomes more open and flexible, and experiential reality is seen to be the ever-present continuum which is of the greatest value of all.

128x128gladmo

Oh boy.... it did not take you long to resurface here yet another time. I sounds like I now have to another name in my long list:

 

theaudioamp

 

deludedaudiophile

 

thynamesinnervoice

 

cindyment

 

snratio

 

yesiamjohn

 

sugabooger

 

dletch2

 

audio2design

 

dannad

 

roberttdid

 

roberttcan

 

heaudio123

 

audiozenology

 

atdavid

@thyname why was he banned?

  • for who he is?
  • for what he says?
  • other?

Admittedly I don’t really understand the soliloquy that the OP @gladmo posted, but the @theaudiomaniac posts were intelligible. 

I don’t know whether he was banned. I am just speculating. Based on historical precedent and tradition of said individual.

 

But as I said earlier, don’t worry. He will be back. With yet another username. Guaranteed. You can bet your lamp cords on that 😉

No worries.  There's a new skin in the game rule for this thread.  $500 deposit to me for authorization to comment, and if the comment doesn't get the commentor banned by admins, then it's returned.  Chameleon troll checkmate. 

It is probably easier for many of us to revert to talking about other members than to understand, and comprehend the original post.

That may be why the thread is now about one member, rather than about philosophy?

A thing’s reality (objective) is not the same as its description (subjective).

The Tao that can be described is not the eternal Tao