Try a sub a third in the back


I’ll share something I stumbled upon in the off chance it transforms your listening experience as it did mine. I purchased a rel s/510 while they were on sale to replace a lesser sub. First, the sub is remarkable. I thought it would just add bass extension. I had no idea it would improve the sound stage so much. But now I had 3 subs with absolutely no space in the front of the room to place the third. I planned to sell it. If you like to tinker like me with your system, you probably would have had the same thought I finally did: connect the third sub for the hell of it. In part, the idea was inspired by the long and very good article someone on here linked to about subs: soundoctor.com that talks about putting a sub at the back of the room for HT. The lower the frequency, the more non directional the sound. So, having a sub behind me should be okay in a two-speaker setup. The worst that might happen, I thought was that I might shake my house off it’s foundation. But what happened was absolutely unexpected. The sound in the room became amazingly three dimensional. This is not hyperbole. I have a good system and especially with the new Rel sub, there was good width, height, and depth to the sound. But the effect of adding the third sub was to double or triple the depth into the room. I didn’t believe it so I turned the rear sub on and off, repeating the songs. I’ve done this for a week because sometimes new experiences don’t hold up over time—a product of wishful thinking. This one has lasted. I will describe the change this way. Without the rear sub, the vocals were centered, other instruments were placed around the front of the room—some further away than others. Adding the rear sub stretched the centered voice in front of me from 2d to 3D, like someone was in the room, or better, I was in the vocalist’s room. Imagine taking a photo of the singer and stretching it into a 3-dimensional figure in front of you. It’s like that. Although my previous system had good depth before, with the third sub it sounded like I was swimming in the music. there was an exceptional separation of the instruments around and over me not just in front of me. I won’t go on because results will vary. But if you like to tinker and you have a third sub in the house, give it a go. I hope it turns out as holographically for you as it did for me. (Details: I connected the Rel using the line in from my power amp and two RCA outs on my Dac (it also has XLR outs that I use) to connect the other subs.)

pennpencil

FWIW, I'm  aware of different ways to do it. I was wondering how OP had done it.

 

I did go from a Rel Storm III  to two sealed Rythmiks with servo and was a very significant improvement. Learnt to measure the room, identified key issues, treated the (living) room, and have a 4-way active system with advanced DSP. I've ran subs mono and stereo and haven't come to a preference, at least with 2 of them. I was on my way to adding two additional sealed subs, but detoured on dipole speakers (DIY) and now pondering adding 2 sealed vs 2 OB subs, but surely adding a MiniDSP to allow implementing time delays per Toole, and use of Multitude Optimizer. 

 

Anyway, I was interested in OP's implementation to tie his results to the approach.

Yes a third sub in the back does help, but try moving them around until you find the sweetspot. Ozzy - Have you tried moving your subs out of the corners of the room? I've found I like the sound better when they are not in corners. 

@lewinskih01

Someone was asking how to connect a third sub.

I was giving an example of one of the ways to do it using a splitter in a dual mono configuration.

fiesta75,

I actually have the subs about 2 feet from each corner. The F-113 have a master/slave output for additional subs.

ozzy

Post removed