I cannot advise you since I am unfamiliar with your other equipment and, certainly, with your room. It would be good if you could compare the Q900 with a Vandersteen for yourself.
Kal
Kal
KEF Q 900 ....... Any experience ?
also agree with drubin--$5k has become the new $10k. there seems to be a whole bunch of accessibly-priced speakers that compete with much pricier ones. i read that the new, $4500 revel f208 replaces (and allegedly outperforms) the $7500 f32. haven't heard the new revel, but i did hear the von schweikert vr-33 ($3750), which sounded awfully impressive; even better that the $6k vr4 and alot of megabuck stuff i've heard. i assume that manufacturers are outsourcing production and/or making aesthetic and other compromises to get costs down, but it's certainly a good trend for the audio buyer. |
Another +1 for drubin's observation. I just read a href=http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/kef3/1.html>6Moons review of the KEF R900 where the reviewer summarized this observation very well: Progress over the last few years has favored ... to which I'd add the more widespread use of neodymium magnets, curved cabinet profiles, better bracing, longer excursion surrounds, and near-exotic light and rigid diaphragm materials such as the Monitor Audio CCAM (ceramic/magnesium) drivers. Their Gold Series even uses CCAM ribbon tweeters in a $5.5K and under series. |