Interesting
I recall a ONKYO amp I had back in the 80's had a built in 5 level EQ.
I liked playing with it.
I just ran all EQ's all the way up except the middle eq.
I'm not that interested in the EQ test, although as you say might show some weakness.
You might find usage as you design and build for customers.
I'm pretty happy with the 2 DL's, and am sure the additon of the Tang band W3 will also add some nice charms.
I knid of ... you know what,,,In fact what you are saying has some truth...The DLVX8 all by iteslf is quite livable, I have no issues with it as a stand alone speaker
But thought, since I have the DLW4 just sitting in the closet,,why not see what happens along with the DLVX8. BINGO,,the EQ's missing in the DLVX8 were padded by the EQ's in the DLW4. Diana Kralls voice just came to life.
Apparently whatever EQ's were weak in the DLVX8 were padded by the EQ's in the W4.
No speaker is perfect flat response.
I recall a ONKYO amp I had back in the 80's had a built in 5 level EQ.
I liked playing with it.
I just ran all EQ's all the way up except the middle eq.
I'm not that interested in the EQ test, although as you say might show some weakness.
You might find usage as you design and build for customers.
I'm pretty happy with the 2 DL's, and am sure the additon of the Tang band W3 will also add some nice charms.
I knid of ... you know what,,,In fact what you are saying has some truth...The DLVX8 all by iteslf is quite livable, I have no issues with it as a stand alone speaker
But thought, since I have the DLW4 just sitting in the closet,,why not see what happens along with the DLVX8. BINGO,,the EQ's missing in the DLVX8 were padded by the EQ's in the DLW4. Diana Kralls voice just came to life.
Apparently whatever EQ's were weak in the DLVX8 were padded by the EQ's in the W4.
No speaker is perfect flat response.

