On ''what there is''

Fact is just a particular probability density function, fleeting as that might be… Even the so called God Particle lives but a short “ life “.

Facts are way more hard and comes from a way more deep layer of meaning than probability function... :)

I recomment to you the books of Bernard Mandelbrot and his disciple : Nassim Nicholas Taleb...

And quantum theory is an expression of ultimate consciousness not his root...

Materialism die suddenly with Planck first and Heisenberg....Journalist had not noted that yet... :)

By the way there is 2 sigificant event in my life : love and prime numbers distribution....Bach is the sum of the 2 for me in music....Sun RA is an "error" i will die to keep with me....

😊

Anyway yeah, I am thankful we have Raul and chakster. We now return you to the thread with the most entertainingly misleading title ever.

😁😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

Gustave Giuliaume is the greatest, Goete is the greatest,
Goedel is also the greatest and Einstein also.
While we are comparing ''analog stuff'' to discover which is
the best we must recognise that statements like ''Peter is
the longest guy in the class but George is even longer'' make
no sense. There is also this Roman nonsense about ''primus
inter pares'' . This is accepted all over the world as Roman
''principle '' but how is it possible that all are equal ?
That is why Frege stated that ''subject'' and ''predicate''
as grammar categories are not suitable for the science. 
That is why he wanted to produce language suitable for
science. Regarding relational statement which presuppose
more ''subjects'' than one he proposed functions with two
or more arguments. If I am well informed this is used in
mathematics. Alas mathematics is my ''Achilles heel''. 















w

TIme to throw some Wittgenstein into the mix!