Any JBL 4367 owners or opinion?


If you own a pair of JBL 4367 what do you think of them and what did you own before?



What do you feel you gained or lost over your prior speakers?



I have been intrigued by horn speakers lately. I demoed a few speakers from another brand but they did not do it for me. I am very particular about a flat frequency response and the measurements seem very good on the 4367 but I also might just not be a horn guy, not sure yet.


A lot of the older comments on this forum seem to be scrubbed regarding the JBL 4367.
Thanks,
James
james633
I personally like JBL a lot, but many on this forum are against JBL. Some say they are too bright or fatiguing. Maybe they are just very sad that they sold theirs and moved to something else? I would say listen to them for awhile, quite awhile, then go listen to something else in their price range. I would be willing to bet that you will come back to your 4367's! For me, the lower number of drivers you have the more coherent the sound.
Bang on ! IF you love em, go for it. Everyone should own JBL at some point in the audio and musical journey. I had some L-110 back in the day. JBL seem to be on revitalize part of the wave…my best to them and the OP
If it means anything, Charlie, owner US Tube Audio, played the 4367s
for us a couple years back in his Scottsdale showroom. 

He also had some Revel floor standers. 

After we said we liked them, $9,000/pair if memory serves,
he admitted he used them at home in his system.

I like horns and have owned Altec Maestros before
I went over to Tannoy FSM dual concentric 15"s

I sold the Altec when I bought the Tannoys. Now I wish I still
had them. Some things the horns just do better.  Acoustic guitar
being one.

Detail and depth of image are the advantage I hear with JBL horns. A pair of 4333's in my main system. Would love to hear a pair of 4367's.
Yes I think the 4367 looks very interesting. The coaxial mid/tweet horn design catches my attention for sure.