How are Hig-End Speakers Priced?


I recently (early Feb 2012) purchased a pair of Model 61 Human Speakers, intending to build a small office system with them. I've been listening to them through my main system for a few days now, while breaking them in. These were purchased directly from the builder/designer; my cost was only $675, delivered to my door.

I am so very impressed with the build quality of these small speakers and the quality of the music emanating from them (even though they are not yet fully broken in). I'm honestly surprised they are as inexpensive as they are, and have begun wondering how high-end speakers are priced.

The speakers are manufactured in the Northeast US, and (so far as I know) the builder/designer doesn't advertise and doesn't attend trade shows. The speakers are built with only one pair of binding terminals, two hand-built drivers, and a very simple 1st-order crossover using a design I believe is refined from an 1970's-era design. I'm not sure how much the designer is actively pursuing R&D currently.

I'm wondering if there is a formula that speaker manufacturers generally use when designing/pricing their products. For example, does a manufacturer target a price point, and then decide to follow an "industry-standard" formula like (say) 15% for R&D, 15% for materials, 15% for manufacturing/assembly, 15% for marketing, 15% for distribution, 15% for manufacturer's profit, and balance for seller's profit? Certainly, eliminating (or reducing) one or more of the above categories could yield a speaker that is much less expensive than the price point it was designed for.

Any thoughts?
rx7audio
Do you think if a manufacturer does not have a dealer withing 100 miles of you that they should sell to you direct at wholesale - no real reason they should take a dealer's cut on top of what they ordinairly make - right? I do understand paying a dealer for the service and ffacilities they provide, but if I'm not be services by a dealer, I would not pay the manufacturer for a service not rendered.
02-28-12: Branislav
Eldartford, makes you wonder how many high end manufacturers are using the same tactics?
Branislav, EVERONE of them does without exception!! don't think too hard about this as it'll make your head spin & might even get you riled up.....
Pubul57, I understand your perspective, but the dealers would be outraged if the potential for undercut to them, came from the manufacturer themselves. The manufacturer would now on some level be acting as dealer, something that would add to their costs and perhaps it's something they're less well suited to do. After all, if there were issues, you would now take them to the manufacturer. It would be a difficult to be both a manufacturer and direct discount seller, and at the same time maintain an MSRP dealer network. I think on some level it might be incompatible. Furthermore, what would prevent someone from purchasing discounted merchandise from the manufacturer and then reselling at a cost less than dealers offer, in a manner that might compromise the manufacturer's marketing and customer care strategy. Never mind, opening the potential for counterfeit products, for which the duped consumer might expect the original manufacture to be responsible for. Grey market?
Would 200 miles be sufficient protection? At some point the dealer simply can't service the customer. I believe in protection the dealership witin reason based on territory - but in this day and age some product are found in 3 dealers and 500+ miles away. It is a complex issue, and one I don't think the manfufacturers have solved - the dealer networks simply don't serve much of the country anymore, and you do want to protect those that make the financial investment in carrying the product - don't know what the answer is, but the current model is quite right.
I think that's why we're starting to see catalogue merchants like Crutchfield starting to carry high end lines.