MSRP, diferentiation and the illusion of value


I've been an audiophile for a very long time.  I've gotten to listen to a wide variety of gear, and even participated in the creation and manufacture of some audio gear in my past.  Took college courses in audio engineering I was not prepared for, and read quite a bit from the usual audio rags.

I want to share something I think every audiophile should know, which is how manufacturers leverage the suggested retail price (MSRP) as well as product differentiation to create this illusion of value.

A lot of gear sounds different. Cables are good examples. You make a cable which sounds different to a perceptive ear.  It doesn't matter if it's better or worse, but just make it different, and raise the MSRP above other cables costing similar prices to manufacture. Throw on some connector jewelry and exotic fabric to dress them in and bam, your $1 to make cable just became $250.

My point is, too often audiophiles want to equate different sounding with better. If the MSRP is higher, well, that reinforces this idea that this difference must be going towards some illusory holy grail, floating above the tower of nuns. Another factor that benefits the seller is that we almost never ask ourselves how much this difference is worth.  Lets accept that these cables, or speakers or amps are different sounding, and that you have judged that difference as preferable to what you wanted to buy when you started. How many of us step back and ask "is this difference worth the $$$ being asked?" Will it make my life that much better, or am I just bejeweling my sensual pleasures every chance I get?

I'm not begrudging anyone the right to spend money how they please.  I do however think audiophiles who feel like they work hard for their money to stop and think about these natural forces when judging how they will spend it.
erik_squires
It goes the other way also Erik. You create a line of speakers based on very cheap drivers and enclosures in a unique pattern, then make up some totally ridiculous marketing hype and undercut the industries pricing. Price is king. If you can make people think they are getting a high tech piece for cheap dollars you can make a fortune. Tekton is a perfect example.  
Look you DO get a lot of speaker in terms of of size with Tekton per dollar, at least historically. Size does matter and can help make up for other things in some cases. Just another choice that is unique enough to stand out FBOFW especially if you are running tube amps where good choices are fewer and often but not always more expensive, being a niche market. Tekton is often a solid choice for tube amp owners with a limited budget for speakers. At least that is how I look at them. Probably not my first choice, but a solid one if a certain model floats one's boat.
The Tekton driver's aren't that cheap.  They are actually pretty good and I find the arrangement clever enough.  It is a little derivative from a lot of other ideas, but what a great way to get a coaxial mid-tweeter.  If the arrangement controls the dispersion appropriately so listeners get similar effects to ESLs or horns without the downsides then more power to them.

I've never heard them, by the way, and I'm quite happy with my current set up.  I'm just saying that this is an innovative and price appropriate design.
Forgive me @mijostyn but Dunlavy created speakers with inexpensive drivers that worked perfectly and sounded excellent, and still do.
A rarity and most likely underpriced. So money are well spent there.
As for Tekton, their asking price is not out of this world for what is offered.
BTW: Anyone who wants to know how good Satori drivers are should consider this kit, from Madisound:


https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/2-way-speaker-kits/copy-satori-ara-2-way-speaker-kit-pair-with...


AFAIK though I've only seen Tekton use the Satori tweeters.  This kit also uses the Satori mid-woofers as well which have a lot of care and high technology behind them.