The Sound of Speaker.

Prejudice?
Sounds like aprejudice to me.
Happy that you found what you like.
If you are there, an open mind won't improve your life any.

Tannoys dual concentric drivers have a unique sound that can take some getting used to. However, once you do, there is no returning to other speakers, jmo. 

@ samadhana
Sorry to see you leave. Please consider staying. It helps to understand many here have egos so large they have lost the ability to be polite.  I happen to agree with you, and for you it is Horns, for me it is Planar. 

As my journey has ended at a Horn-speaker.
Horns are high sensitivty, 
Excellent for midrange/low mids, all ranges of highs,,Not so much for real bass at 40hz-60hz
Here is where you will needa  midrange woofer.
Thus point is, Horns are really only good fro 2khz-20hz
But if I am going high sens, I'd rather goa  high fidelity full range cone speaker. 
I think there is more realism in a  FR cone vs a  FR horn system. 
Besides some horns for mids/bass are gigantic and heay, + very pricey.
So  horns  are for  the wealthy with huge listening rooms.
I hate huge speakers they are ugly. Both massive horns and Wilson Monstas weighing 600 lbs each. 

I’m pretty fond of ring and domes too


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


For my full orchestra and other huge sound stage music like  big jazz bands, I've found all domes to be rather limited.
I mean what range do these tweeters produce? Midrange - highs. Thats a LOT of hz's to handle fora  atiny 1.5 inch opening.
For this task you need the 6.5 or 8 inch FR which has a cone for deeper, wider, more realistic soundstage.

For light jazz,  easy music , dome tweets are acceptable.
But who has a collection limited to light music?
Better to get a  FR which can handle both  easy loads and full orchestra. 
A FR mids/highs are in a whole nother league vs the dated dome tweeters.