Cat Scratch Fever?
Libs are Sooooooo gullible. Pandemic, Scamdemic. the CPP knows they have their allegiance, especially at the top where BIG $$$ is to be made. Go to 3:55 ’This is clearly more evidence you cannot trust the mainstream media’ - YouTube |
Do not listen to talk radio.said the propogandist. I've listened to Rush for yrs. Before that it was other talk radio. Plus I do my own research. If I still debated with libs, I'd gladly debate you on any political topic. But after spending many yrs on the Outside Asylum & Water Cooler, I quit trying to make any logical arguments with libs because it was as exasperating as trying to explain trigonometry to a 3 yr old. The problem is that we are NOT headed in the same direction. Two people in St Louis, one going to San Fran & the other to NYC cannot compromise on their destination unless one is willing to change. |
"Other posters responding to MC’s remarks. Just ignore him. Pay no attention, it eventually goes away." It is true that millercarbon has an excuse. He speaks from inexperience. While other radiology technicians were risking their lives to help other people, he was hiding in his listening room trying new tweaks. His biggest published (here) achievement of 2020 was to courageously suspend speaker cables on rubber bands from the parsley bunches. ( Millercarbon's System - Virtual Systems (audiogon.com) middle picture, third row from the bottom, heroic achievement of 2020) Calling people who tried hard to help someone "liars" is above any level of tolerable. |
perkri358 posts 04-21-2021 10:49amQuestion to the CV19 naysayers, do you actually believe what you are writing, or are you spewing this to get a rise out of people? Unfortunately pekri, they are completely serious. It is a problem of extremity. Being skeptical is good. Usually that is a very good quality. However, in some, that skepticism is very selective, and very extreme. Perhaps selective skepticism is not even the right designation. Would it be selectively skeptical to not doubt audio tweak claims, or is it because you have extreme skepticism about anything claimed by relevantly knowledgeable people. I believe it may be the latter. I guess that is still selective skepticism, but perhaps it is really about total avoidance of anything that can be designated as authority, even when that "authority", which is only informational, is acting in your best interests. Psychologically I think it is all a manifestation of insecurity. If you are insecure, you may not be able to admit, even to yourself, that someone, no matter their level of expertise, knows more than you, even though, for most of us, we realize that is the case on almost everything. That does not mean you don't question "experts" as they often step out of their actual expertise and make gross generalizations. We all remember "experts" telling us masks won't help, even when every available piece of evidence said they may. Problem was, those experts were not experts in the actual mechanics of transfer of similar diseases, and the claims were based on established facts, ignoring similar, but as of yet unproven in this case, facts. What they did was equivalent to a smoker saying I have never got cancer from smoking before, so I won't in the future. When you need to feed that insecurity, you will grasp onto anything that supports that goal. Masks is another good example. Virus is <0.3uM, N95 masks only claim to be 95% effective with particles at 0.3uM. No where in that statement does it claim that particles <0.3um cannot be stopped, but if you need to feed an insecurity, that will be what you grasp onto. [Due to electrostatic attraction, many N95 masks are more effective at 0.1uM than they are at 0.3uM]. |
