Excuse me, but you started with your conclusion, that there is nothing wrong with measurements. But your entire argument was nothing but showing all kinds of things wrong with measurements. Then after explaining exactly what is wrong with measurements you conclude that there is nothing wrong with measurements.Millercarbon read more carefully...
He dont speak about measurement the way the "objectivist" speak about them....
You hurry too much on your horse.....
He confirm what i said and what IS the scientific meaning of measurement : RELIABILITY....He even confirm your take on measurement....
For example point 4 in particular:
Measurements all aim at laboratory standards, royally ignoring the requirements of psychoacoustics. That is, we do not measure sound quality as perceived by the human brain. We measure reliability.
Then he IS NOT an "objectivist" audiophile in the "skeptic scientism sunday club" but a true scientific mind...