If you don't have a wide sweet spot, are you really an audiophile?


Hi, it’s me, professional audio troll. I’ve been thinking about something as my new home listening room comes together:

The glory of having a wide sweet spot.

We focus far too much on the dentist chair type of listener experience. A sound which is truly superb only in one location. Then we try to optimize everything exactly in that virtual shoebox we keep our heads in. How many of us look for and optimize our listening experience to have a wide sweet spot instead?

I am reminded of listening to the Magico S1 Mk II speakers. While not flawless one thing they do exceptionally well is, in a good room, provide a very good, stable stereo image across almost any reasonable listening location. Revel’s also do this. There’s no sudden feeling of the image clicking when you are exactly equidistant from the two speakers. The image is good and very stable. Even directly in front of one speaker you can still get a sense of what is in the center and opposite sides. You don’t really notice a loss of focus when off axis like you can in so many setups.

Compare and contrast this with the opposite extreme, Sanders' ESL’s, which are OK off axis but when you are sitting in the right spot you suddenly feel like you are wearing headphones. The situation is very binary. You are either in the sweet spot or you are not.

From now on I’m declaring that I’m going all-in on wide-sweet spot listening. Being able to relax on one side of the couch or another, or meander around the house while enjoying great sounding music is a luxury we should all attempt to recreate.
erik_squires
The MBL’s (though pricey) excel, in the two channel mode, to present a wide soundstage and can be enjoyed in many different listening positions.
Dear @deep_333 : " I choose to move on. "

Yes because your targets/priorities are different.

Oranges has its own characteristics/advantages and disadvantages and apples too but both are way different.
Some of us like more an apple than an orange but this fact does not means that apple ( multichannel. ) is superior to orange ( stereo. ).

The forums as Agon it’s not to see which win and which one beated and you want to win and this is your misunderstood because a forum is a place to share experiences with other gentlemans where those experiences could be or could helps to some one of us and for others gentlemans could helps to confirm what we already know, no one lost and every body ( some way or the other ) win.

Btw, for two way different targets exist two differentiaded solutions: multichannel solution for you and stereo for some of us. That is all about. @ieales posts explain it very well.

R.

When we were setting up my dual purpose room for audio and video (only overlap being the main speakers) using some very nice computer analytics as well as our ears, we found that my main speakers (*large Wilsons) nailed the centre image even better than the Vandersteen centre speaker we were setting up with, so I went with that and will sell the Vandersteen. Surprised both me and the guy setting it up.
Not surprised the Vandersteen did not work with your Wilson speakers because every other driver is out of phase with each other. All Vandersteen centers are time and phase correct therefore all drivers are in phase. Regardless which design one prefers this combination would be a mess and not require any super analysis to know.