2. amps-preamps
  3. 164327-148023

Separates or not?

I'm redoing my office system.  I just bought a pair of Maggie's, the 1.7is.  I have a Bryston 3bnrb for amplification.  The question relates to preamplification.

My budget is around $4000 give or take.  I need mc/mm phono amplification and line level preamplification.  I am looking at new or demo. I would consider used only if it has a significant transferable manufacturer's waranty.

I have a Michel Gyrodec Ii with SME 309 arm, and several different low output MC cartridges(.2-.4 mv output).

My question is, given my needs, would I get better bang for the buck at this price level by getting a preamp with an integrated phono stage, or going with a line level preamp and a separate phono stage?  

Thanks.
xaak
xaak OP
43 posts
 
@oldhvymec2, Yeah I hear you. I ordered the Maggies in mid November and they just came in last week. First, I don’t think I want to wait that long and second, I haven’t yet decided whether I want to go with tubes. I’ve owned both tube and SS, and I have a decision to make if I want to put up with the hassle of tubes again.
xaak OP
43 posts
 
@ jasonbourne52

I like Bryston stuff, but the .5 is way too old a design for me.  I'm looking for something current or at least from within the last few years if I do go used.
russ69's avatar
russ69
3,360 posts
 
   "...I haven’t yet decided whether I want to go with tubes..."

I run my Maggie .7s with tubes but the 1.7 is a different animal. I'd use the Bryston and the pre-amp of your choice.    
xaak OP
43 posts
 
Thanks to everyone who answered, but to nudge this towards getting back on track, I'm redoing my preamplification.

Given a budget of $4k give or take, can I get better bang for the buck with a separate phono preamp and line level preamp or with a preamp with built in phono stage.
russ69's avatar
russ69
3,360 posts
 
Keep your phono preamp as a separate device. More flexibility.
More to discover