It’s true lead singers are key to a group’s success.
The MVP though plays a key role in elevating that group above others in other words the value can be measured by overall success. So a guy like Mick Jagger would qualify in that they are a very successful band. What if the singer was not Mick? Mick is not a great singer. Would the stones have been better off with a better singer? Probably not because Mick also played a major role on writing their songs. So an MVP despite not being a great technical singer. In fact I often think the Stones would be better served live with a better singer because Mick’s live performances though entertaining have often been very ragged and inconsistent vocally IMHO.
The MVP though plays a key role in elevating that group above others in other words the value can be measured by overall success. So a guy like Mick Jagger would qualify in that they are a very successful band. What if the singer was not Mick? Mick is not a great singer. Would the stones have been better off with a better singer? Probably not because Mick also played a major role on writing their songs. So an MVP despite not being a great technical singer. In fact I often think the Stones would be better served live with a better singer because Mick’s live performances though entertaining have often been very ragged and inconsistent vocally IMHO.

