Has anyone compared old to new Audioquest Cables???


I would like some input from anyone with direct experience who has compared the older higher end Audioquest speaker cables that are now used and selling at an obvious reduced price from when they were new to the mid-level newer Audioquest cables like the Rocket 88 Series, just before the newer cables get really pricey.  I would be looking for bi-wire cables for my Vandersteen model 5A speakers.

Thanks in advance.


bigkidz
@steven0713

@desert38



Both of you jumped from Rocket Series to WT right over the Robin Hood series - any input on why the jump?  What and were did you hear the improvements over the Rocket Series with the WT series.

Thanks.
After having Rocket 44 for about a year I made the change to Rocket 88.  There was an improvement in that it did provide a blacker background to music.  I tend to believe this is primarily due to the 88 including the Black DBS devices more than anything else.  Then, after a year with the 88 I made the plunge to William Tell ZERO.  Oh my, that was a revelation of improvement.  I am now hearing musical information in a more distinct manner than ever before, particularly in nuances of detail that seems to trail off forever.  Instrumentation and vocals have never sounded so distinct and precise in my system.  I believe these differences are largely due to having the Carbon DBS devices, the geometry which provides zero characteristic impedance, and the multi-layer carbon-based noise dissipation system.  The terminations also use a higher grade copper than the Rocket series.  Both series use the same hanging silver plating, though.  In other words, the step-up technologies in this series of cable definitely delivers on it's promise.  It's equal to the other best audio investment I have made in my present system.  That other investment was having my BAT VK-33 preamp upgraded to the VK-33SE.  The difference in imaging was quite stunning.  Then I added the William Tell ZERO and fell off of my chair but only after my jaw hit the floor.  These are exaggerations, of course.  My jaw is not that long and I really didn't fall out of my chair.  But sonically, these speaker cables are also quite stunning, no two ways about it.  I'll make an analogy for you.  Imagine looking through a window of exceptionally clear glass at a beautiful mountain scenery of Fall colors.  The glass is so clear that you would think it wasn't even there.  And then you open the window and realize, oh my, this is even better.  
You asked why pass on the Robin Hood ZERO and go to William Tell ZERO.  My answer is that I felt better about having more wire.  The Robin Hood Zero consists of 4 solid PSC+ copper wire at 15 gauge.  The William Tell Zero consists of 6 solid PSC+ copper wire at 13 gauge.  Technologies, otherwise, are the same between these two cables.  Sure, it's more money for one over the other.  But I didn't look at it that way.  I saw it as that is the gauge of wire I want for my speakers and that is the technology I want for my speaker cable.  I couldn't be more happy.
Best to you.  I hope this explanation helped and that you end up with a satisfactory decision.
Note; I also use Tornado power cables and the Niagara 3000.  For signal cables I use Audioquest Earth.  The synergy of cabling from Audioquest is a wonderful way of connecting your entire system.
I'm sorry, but I failed to answer another part of your question.  That is, regarding new Audioquest speaker cables compared to previous generations now selling as used for much less cost.  I can't make that kind of comparison, only to more recent cable models, such as those from the Rocket series.  My only other Audioquest speaker cable was from 30 years ago, when the company was very young and speaker cable technologies were nowhere near what they have been for the past 10 + years.  I am confident, however, that any of the upper-end Audioquest speaker cable from the past 6 to 10 years will certainly deliver an excellent value.  I still stand on my evaluation of the William Tell ZERO, though.  It has the latest technologies from Audioquest and it really shines above the models below it.
One more note; if you must go with a bi-wire configuration and choose William Tell ZERO that requires a separate Bass cable, terminated as bi-wire by Audioquest.  It gets rather expensive.  I had Rocket 88 bi-wire and chose the William Tell ZERO full-range.  It is vastly superior to the bi-wire Rocket 88 I replaced.  I simply added Audioquest jumpers to my speaker binding posts, bringing them back to a full-range connectivity.
@mammothguy54,
Great post!
Your experience mimics mine.
The new cables/conditioners Garth Powell is releasing are undoubtedly the best AQ has made. There will be doubters, but, those of us who have heard the difference, know better.
Bob
What models of the older top of the line cables are the model names?  I don't really know them.

Two more questions:

Between the Robin Hood and the WT models.  I understand the wire thickness but how much better are they in reality?

Last with my Vandersteen Model 5A speakers will the bi-wire be necessary (I see that one run is for the bass specifically designed for bi-wire) but how much would I lose using a single run with jumpers?

Thanks again.