Many years ago I owned an SP 10 and never thought much of it sound wise but to be fair, I was using an early 1980's Sony receiver and an entry level Grado cartridge. Currently, I have a very good phono stage and I'm using a Thorens TD 160 MK1 that I've been modifying. I've built a hard maple plinth for it, have dampened the chassis and sub chases, upgraded to Wireworld phono cable, added a Herbies record mat, grungebuster washers and isolation feet, upgraded the headshell and leads and installed an Audio Technica 33 mono anniversary cartridge. Eventually, I will upgrade to a better tonearm, probably a Jelco. Yes, it's a FrankenThorens but I'm unsentimental about its stock build and each change I've done to it has rendered a sonic improvement aside from maybe the headshell. It will stay as a mono table. If I were to buy a new table, I'd opt for an upper level Rega.
Technics or Thorens, need suggestions
I've been looking to get into Analog for quite some time now. So long that I've been collecting Vinyl with a dream of finally getting a nice TT. Analog is an uncharted territory for me. I've been researching on my free time and have come up with a couple possibilities.
Thorens TD 1600
Technics 1200G
Budget is around 3-5k without a cartridge . I have Mcintosh C2600 which I intend to use for phono.
I like the aesthetics of Thorens much more than Technics.
My research showed that Technics is a superb TT for the price. How do these two compare?
my systems: Mcintosh MC452/C2600/Sonus Faber Elipsa
mastersound 845 integrated/ diapason adamantes 3
Thorens TD 1600
Technics 1200G
Budget is around 3-5k without a cartridge . I have Mcintosh C2600 which I intend to use for phono.
I like the aesthetics of Thorens much more than Technics.
My research showed that Technics is a superb TT for the price. How do these two compare?
my systems: Mcintosh MC452/C2600/Sonus Faber Elipsa
mastersound 845 integrated/ diapason adamantes 3
- ...
- 47 posts total
Many years ago I owned an SP 10 and never thought much of it sound wise but to be fair, I was using an early 1980’s Sony receiver and an entry level Grado cartridge. SP-10 or SP-10 MK2 ? First is from the late 60’s, second is from the mid 70’s. The difference between those two Technics models is HUGE Technics chronicle available on their website, there was so many models release between the SP-10 and SP-10 mkII Technics SP-10 mkII today is better than any Rega turntable and better than ALL belt drive turntables under $2k. Refurbished SP-10 mkII will outperform almost everything on belt drive territory up to $4k. Rega is simply not on that level at all. SP-10 mkII in some nice wooden plinth with Micro Seiki copper mat and modern high-end tonearm like Reed 3p is absolutely killer turntable. Upgrade is possible, but only to another Direct Drive. here is my ex SP-10 mkII. Even much cheaper SP-20 with some nice tonearms like these is better than all those funny belt drives. Add SAEC SS-300 mat and nice disc stabilizer and you're done, an excellent vintage Direct Drive in original Technics Obsidian plinth SH-10B3. |
- 47 posts total

