@chakster : ""
I have FR 64s, FR 64fx, Ikeda IT-345
For all of them PS is 230mm..."" "" I just use what Ikeda suggested us to use,..""
Ikeda/FR spec/suggestion is an EL of 245mm, that is their recomendation and because they choosed Stevenson alignment then the P2S is 230.09mm: it's not a sugestion by Ikeda that P2S is only the result of the Stevenson solution for a EL of 245mm.
It was the same for the FR/Ikeda long tonearms 66/407 where the suggested/spec for those tonearms is 307mm of EL and due the choice of Stevenson alignment the P2S is 295mm but this P2S is not a suggestion by the manufacturer. GOT it?
For what you are still posting you still just do not understand the overall alignment subject and what Löfgren wants it and its implications. You are out of focus for say the least.
The discussion in this thread is not to look for a winner but that we all understand the whole subject and in this manner all of us win.
R.
For all of them PS is 230mm..."" "" I just use what Ikeda suggested us to use,..""
Ikeda/FR spec/suggestion is an EL of 245mm, that is their recomendation and because they choosed Stevenson alignment then the P2S is 230.09mm: it's not a sugestion by Ikeda that P2S is only the result of the Stevenson solution for a EL of 245mm.
It was the same for the FR/Ikeda long tonearms 66/407 where the suggested/spec for those tonearms is 307mm of EL and due the choice of Stevenson alignment the P2S is 295mm but this P2S is not a suggestion by the manufacturer. GOT it?
For what you are still posting you still just do not understand the overall alignment subject and what Löfgren wants it and its implications. You are out of focus for say the least.
The discussion in this thread is not to look for a winner but that we all understand the whole subject and in this manner all of us win.
R.

