Something For The Fuse Guys ...

People who demand proof don’t understand the situation. 

When you control the mail you control...information! - Newman 

Well he started his company right around the time he was busted down to training co-ordinator ... so your theory could hold some weight. But come on, you got to admit those magic pebbles are comedy gold!


mapman16,252 posts10-23-2019 10:43amToo bad Geoff can’t muster up any valid test results at all these days to support his bread and butter hifi theories about fuses, wire direction, Teleportation Tweaks, you name it.

If his supposed methodology at Nasa was at all similar to what he presents here these days, I"m guessing he was canned pronto and found his new comfy home selling made-up, unsupported, theoretical concepts to desperate, gullible hifi enthusiasts with money to burn. 

I know he would be if he performed his current act and worked for me.

Published? .... pure comedy gold Gerry, that's pure gold!  I wonder if The Onion is hiring?

geoffkait17,650 posts10-23-2019 11:00ammoops, I published How the Clever Lil Clock ⏰ Works with May and Peter Belt 6 years ago. I published the Definitive Explanation for How the Intelligent Chip Works 15 years ago. And The Story of How The Teleportation Tweak Works more recently. My, how Time flies. Thanks for asking.

Thinking about A/B testing, it occurred to me, how many times I’ve heard, "expectation bias", to discount the conclusions, when conducted by the typical audiophile(the tweak doesn’t matter). Today; I pictured a cadre of fire-breathing, rabid, naysayers(perhaps, even degreed), wondering what their, "expectation bias" might be, regarding the completely impartial(of course) listening test, in which they’ll participate. I haven’t, however, heard anything about peer pressure, within such a group. What are the odds, anyone within such a group(the completely impartial cadre, mentioned above), would dare say they heard an improvement, or- so much as a difference, knowing what they might face, from their peers(ie: being called a, "Fusist", ostracism, ridicule, black-listed from any further, impartial, testing, etc / just think about today’s political climate). Then; I’m also supposed to take the word(as Gospel/whatever), from those with whom I have no familiarity, as regards either their hearing health or listening tastes/training/abilities(just. "Trust me!") Call me a skeptic.

roberttcan"he started his company right around the time he was busted down to training co-ordinator"

That sounds like a vile, offensive, and abusive characterization so I would only reply as you do in you're own words that "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."