Dear dover, this is the most strange argument against my proposition
I have ever heard; that primary language in Japan is not English.
If you read whatever translation from Japanese in English you can
hardly understand what they mean (grin). However our discussion is
in English and in this language one discriminate between NUT and
STABILIZER. The function of an name is to refer to some object in
the so called ''reality''. In this reality one can see the difference
between an nut and an stabilizer. If ''form follows function'' then
the function of both objects is different: nut is to fasten something to
something else , stabilizer to , uh, stabilize with weight the involved
construction.
I have ever heard; that primary language in Japan is not English.
If you read whatever translation from Japanese in English you can
hardly understand what they mean (grin). However our discussion is
in English and in this language one discriminate between NUT and
STABILIZER. The function of an name is to refer to some object in
the so called ''reality''. In this reality one can see the difference
between an nut and an stabilizer. If ''form follows function'' then
the function of both objects is different: nut is to fasten something to
something else , stabilizer to , uh, stabilize with weight the involved
construction.