Which cost more: your system or your car?

System, at least 10X cost of my latest car [ a 1995, which I bought 5 years ago]. It was a $35000 car I bought for $6000; I use the same method in buying audio, older quality models, let someone else take the initial hit.

It is a 1995 Volvo Turbo, so there are two of us.

My system costs more... But I am not into cars, I have always felt they are the worst "investment" you can make... they cost a lot and lose value no matter what. I always got my kicks out of extreme skiing, mountain biking etc.

hmmmmm, well one of the cars has had so many modifications that the cost of it new in 2007 then all of the mods is much higher than my stereo, but that's a toy (sickness) similar to audio. We also bought a new car in 2009 that was more than the stereo, but we do have a POS 2002 Ford Expedition that the wife won't get rid of since she says the kids would just trash a new car, and they would, like they do the Expedition.

So I'm firmly in the minority with "Cars" as my answer.

My car cost more.

Its a great late model car but I like my audio system more.

Plus, I have never had a maintenance issue with my audio systems over the years upon years upon years!