What’s your vote for the most ridiculous, overpriced, and useless tweak?


My vote: Furutech Outlet Cover 105 NCF $220, with “special crystalline material that has two “active” properties.” https://www.thecableco.com/outlet-cover-105-ncf.html

glow_worm
Post removed 
Geoff,
As usual, we disagree. At least you like the Ramones.There may still be hope.



Lance
As has been written earlier, I find it hard to accept a little metal box that sells for $50,000 has the same amount of technology, testing, and time invested of a similarly priced Mercedes. Or that a record clamp is a technological marvel enough to cost $4K.

Adam Smith wrote that something is worth whatever you pay for it and I can agree with it, but many of the tweaks out now - the ones costing many thousands of dollars, seem simply like trinkets designed to assure those who can afford them that it's okay to afford them.
I read an article about pricey resonators one month ago....Very pricey.... I dont think: that is only and pure "snake-oil", people are so gullible etc...And I dont rant to expel some emotions about the general stupidity of the world except myself... Face reality, think and experiment; I decide to made my own resonators at practically no cost and it is the better innovation tweak that I ever experience and that give me my dream: an audio system of very good level... Forget that without all the tweaks + the resonators I experiment with except with substantial amount of ...

Simple: dont rant, think, experiment and communicate to us your experience for a better listening experience...
mahgister,
Don't think for a moment that I discourage playing about with the system. This should be fun. I go back to say 1963 when I was rewinding my slot car motors with #32 wire, balancing, polishing, and upgrading my Mabuchi's to beat the expensive Mura brand name motors. I got pretty good at it. I built my own frames from scratch as well just as I build amplifiers now.


The idea I wanted to express was not that you should not experiment. I applaud your initiative. That's a sane way to approach things, experiment and verify results.


What I did want to put on the table was the note that the original poster asked a fun question about the most ridiculous, bizarre, and laughable aspects of our hobby, a subject that should have been greeted with mirth, and while many joined in with the fun, a number of purveyors of the ridiculous, bizarre, and laughable descended on the tableau to let us know that the loony way is the way of the wise. The cabal of the crazy could not restrain themselves from educating us away from our transgressions.

Please, those of us who, dare I say it, have been doing this for over 40 years, yes I said it again, have had time and experience to sort the wheat from the chaff.


There are plenty of people still angry about Copernicus. There are Alchemists about still. Listen to them if you like. That's fine.  Still, as I asked before, why do those revisionists who refuse to let skeptics think like skeptics insist so assuredly of promulgating the absurd as Gospel so vociferously that a fun thread becomes, well becomes what a lot of threads become.

Keep experimenting. Keep thinking. Keep having fun. That's exactly what you should do.

Listening to the eye bulging Gurus?

Not so much.


Cheers,

Lance