cartridge cost/quality/performance


I would like to see if there is any common experience among the members of this board regarding cartridges, performance, design and cost. So, to start out, I would state that the best performing cartridge I own, and have used in a number of arms and on different tables is my Lyra Delos. I have used it with SMe 309 and 345 arms, as well as Helius Omega. I have used it on my Sota Cosmos IV, Oracle Delphi V SE and Transrotor Fat Boy. All of these have run through a Simaudio LP5.3 phono preamp with PSX5.3 power supply loaded at 100 ohms.

So, why is it my best performing. Because it seems to hit all the bases as far as frequency response, clarity, detail, soundstage, musicality etc. Specifically, it seems effortless in its presentation, with no specific area that stands out as being better or worse than any other area of musical presentation. For me, that effortlessness adds to the realism of the presentation. The Lyra Delos lists for about $1500. It uses a fine line stylus and is a low output MC putting out about .2mv. The theory behind the Delos is to locate the coils centered in the magnetic field and therefore, the VTF of the cartridge is a much narrower range than most, not because it cant track outside that range, but because Lyra designed the cartridge to work best within a certain area in the magnetic field. I believe that principle helps achieve the effortless and linear nature of the resulting presentation.

I have experience with many mid/hi MC cartridges including Dyna 17d2, Monster Alpha 1 and Genesis 2000, Sumiko Talisman B and S, Benz Micro Glider, Coral EX777 and GAS Sleeping Beauty, Accuphase AC-1, Madrigal Carnegie One and ClearAudio Sigma. Each of those are excellent cartridges that I could live with, but none are quite as competent across the full performance spectrum as the Lyra Delos. I have to assume that a good portion of that performance is attributable to restricting the stylus movement to that certain area of magnetic field.

My experience with MM cartridges in better arms and tables is more limited. I currently use an Ortofon 2m Black in an SME 309 on one table. It is very good also, and very linear, but not quite as effortless as the Lyra. I have also listened to Shure V15mxr, Stanton 681eee and some other cartridges and have found them to lack energy. they play the notes, but don't touch me in the same way. I realize that words like effortless and energy are not very technical, but they are the best way I can describe what I hear and why I prefer one over the other.

Note that all of my MC cartridges would fit into the lower to mid range price zone. Most of my MC cartridges would be considered vintage, whereas the Lyra is a current model. While part of the difference may be due to age, I have no way to allow for that in my listening.

That being said, I recently bought a dynavector Te Kaitura Rua, a cartridge I have long had an interest in, which was recently available for a fraction of its list price. I have only listened to a couple of albums with this cartridge, and am still trying different loadings, but it seems promising. Hasnt yet surpassed the Lyra.

So, for the purposes of this discussion, I'd like to know what cartridges forum members have owned or listened to extensively in their own systems, what cartridges they decided worked best in their system, and why they think that cartridge was better than any others they tried.
manitunc
Big Lyra Delos fan here too Manitunc...
I think this cartridge is all about compromises. Its healthy output means it isn't quite so desirous of a £20K ultra high gain phono stage. It doesn't go for the ultimate high-res stylus profile either but doesn't seem to lack resolution.
Really an example in sensible design and a top bang-for-buck value cartridge.

Also think you've made good choices with the Simaudio.
I am currently trying a Dynavector Rua. Cant say its better or worse yet than the Lyra. It is different. Need to play with cartridge loading a bit. Another interesting design.
Nothing matters more than tracking performance. 

Especially that final furlong as you approach the run out groove...

Everything else is just a matter of taste.
My best performing cartridge has been my Ortofon Jubilee in terms of reliability, performance - detail retrival, midrange texture, and authority in the bottom end.  Great tracker.  

Perhaps my favorite has been Transfiguration Proteus which takes the performance of the Jubilee up a notch in the area of detail and nuance in the top end.  Solid tracker, unfortunately at about the 500 hour mark it developed an issue I have not been able to resolve.  I have replaced with the Jubilee and will try the tranny again when I get in the mood.

I use a Vector 4 tonearm on a Basis 2200 signature into an Allnic H3000 phono preamp.  My next cartridge venture I am leaning towards is an Ortofon Candenza Bronze which I have heard several time at shows but never in my system.  From what I have read it should be a great match for my Thiel CS6’s or 3.6’s.
cd318
Nothing matters more than tracking performance. Especially that final furlong as you approach the run out groove..
Actually, it's not inherently difficult to track an LP runout track.  It's common for audiophiles to claim a cartridge "tracks well" just because it doesn't skip or sound especially distorted, even if they've done nothing to actually test tracking performance.

Many LP test records have bands especially for testing tracking performance. It's high frequencies, and high excursions from transients and LF, that test tracking.