Longer speaker cables or interconnects


I have a feeling that this may be a topic that has already been discussed to death, but the only thread I’ve found so far is one at Stereophile.

I will I’ll be moving into my new home with a new semi dedicated semi anechoic listening room, and I am just realizing now that maybe the 25 ft speaker cable runs vs the 3 to 4 ft interconnect runs that I was used to in my old NYC loft for decades is maybe not the optimal ratio.

I presume that that I don’t want a long interconnect between the turntable and the preamp.

I’m looking for various points of views and justifications for them. Remember, one caveat is that I’m the kind of guy who will spend only a moderate amount of dollars for interconnects and speaker cable. Thank you all.
128x128unreceivedogma
Post removed 
Seriously, if a cable can carry a signal for over a thousand miles without harm, what's a meter or two here and there?

Imagine the mileage of cabling they use to use in recording studios during the so- called golden age.

If Nat King Cole, Sinatra, Peggy Lee can sound that good 70 years ago under those conditions then its absolutely pointless to worry.

The OP is right to spend his money carefully on cables because no system ever built can yet improve on the original recordings. At any price.

Sometimes remastering from original sources can remove the smear imposed by too much mixing down / or by mastering from worn tapes. 

Regarding the isolation of your turntable you should try to enhance the decks ability to prevent outside resonance from interfering with the tracking. Hopefully, if its not a budget deck, the designer has already done most of the work for you.

Imagine? Imagine is right. Your imagination is running away with you. 🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️
"The speaker cable was close to the best that Monster - a new company at the time - had to offer in 1985"

Wow, that's old, has it turned green yet?

dill,

no moisture. Sorry.

Old? The speaker’s serial # puts them at 1954, the year I was born. 

Now that’s old!