Cartridge Loading- Low output M/C


I have a Plinius Koru- Here are ADJUSTABLE LOADS-
47k ohms, 22k ohms, 1k ohms, 470 ohms, 220 ohms, 100 ohms, 47 ohms, 22 ohms

I'm about to buy an Ortofon Cadenza Bronze that recommends loading at 50-200 ohms

Will 47 ohms work? Or should I start out at 100 ohms?

I'm obviously not well versed in this...and would love all the help I can get.

Also is there any advantage to buying a phono cartridge that loads exactly where the manufacturer recommends?

Any and all help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
krelldog
Between 475 and 100,000 ohms I must confess that the differences I think I hear in the music are so small they may be imagined. Is this to be expected or should I run immediately to a good Otolarygologist?
About 30 years ago I worked on developing a box that would allow a person to know what the right loading value for a LOMC cartridge actually was. To this end, I had to pass squarewaves through the cartridge, as the proper loading would be that which prevented 'ringing' a harmonic distortion caused by the fact that the cartridge is an inductor.
To my surprise, I discovered that any LOMC could pass a 20KHz squarewave regardless of loading. The only thing that changed was if the loading value was reduced too much, the output went down.
That was when I realized something else was afoot with loading. Its not the cartridge, its the preamp that is reacting, as described elsewhere in this thread (the loading box concept was thus abandoned).

Some takeaways (all previously covered):
1) If your phono section requires loading to sound right, it is due to an overload margin problem, inherent instability of the circuit, or both.
2) If the circuit is unstable, you will experience more ticks and pops that sound like the LP has a noisy surface.
3) the loading will decrease the compliance of the cartridge, which in turn will reduce its high frequency response. How much is hard to say, but some people (myself included) have heard loading act like a tone control, and this may be part of the reason why, since under normal circumstances, the RF peak that results is usually well outside the audio band unless a MM cartridge is used or the tone arm cable has crazy high capacitance. 


"""   (all previously covered) """

So we have here an " instant  repetition " of those take aways that at the end are really usless because every one already owns what they own.

Maybe, another " instant repetition " is in order for really slower brains ( stupid. ). Go a head.
@cather10 Thanks for the encouragement. I like the PII very much and think I will live with it at least until I upgrade my tonearm. I had been running the Hana at 475 Ohms and 56 dB until I read this thread this morning. Then I put on the cans and did some listening and am going to try 100K Ohms for a while and see what it's like to live with that. Now here's where I show my lack of expertise. I haven't been able to measure my phono cable's capacitance. My multimeter just reads 0.0 F, even though it has a uF range. Neither have I been able to track down the capacitance per foot of the Cardas 4x24 connecting the arm to the PII. 

@atmasphere , I am not sure of the implications of your statements as they regard my set-up, unless it's that the PII has a stable circuit. I hope.
Thanks for all the sharing!  
@2channel8 well if you have been running at 475 ohms then I can only assume you have a low cap cable. If you had a high cap cable I have a feeling you would hear the difference.
You should find out though, email the cable mfg and ask them. Let us know what 100K ohms does for you.....I have never tried that high of a setting on my Nova II