Okay, so they had him ranked around #15 I think. If you look at the list of people he is in front of you'll see how ridiculous this is. He's good, he's interesting but top 100 he ain't. I would list some people who I don't listen to as much as I listen to Neil, but I recognize that they are the greater talent on the instrument. And as much as I enjoy Mark Rothko's chapel in Houston, I don't know if it would even occur to me to list him as one of the top 100 visual artists. In short, these things shouldn't be mere popularity contests. Some evaluation of talent and skill should figure in, don't you think?